Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Poll for "IS-IS Topology-Transparent Zone" - draft-chen-isis-ttz-11.txt
Support adoption of "IS-IS Topology-Transparent Zone" - draft-chen-isis-ttz-11.txt . Thanks Mehmet -- *From:* Lsr on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee) *Sent:* Tuesday, August 18, 2020 10:16 AM *To:* lsr@ietf.org *Subject:* [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Poll for "IS-IS Topology-Transparent Zone" - draft-chen-isis-ttz-11.txt Based on the discussions in the last meeting and on the mailing list regarding draft-chen-isis-ttz-11, the chairs feel that there are enough differences with draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-03 and in the community to consider advancing it independently on the experimental track. These differences include abstraction at arbitrary boundaries and IS-IS extensions for smooth transition to/from zone abstraction. We are now starting an LSR WG adoption call for draft-chen-isis-ttz-11.txt. Please indicate your support or objection to adoption prior to Tuesday, September 2nd, 2020. Thanks, Acee and Chris ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Poll for "IS-IS Topology-Transparent Zone" - draft-chen-isis-ttz-11.txt
Hi All, As Co-Author, I support working group adoption of this draft as experimental. With Regards Anil S N On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 7:47 PM Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > > > Based on the discussions in the last meeting and on the mailing list > regarding draft-chen-isis-ttz-11, the chairs feel that there are enough > differences with draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-03 and in the community to > consider advancing it independently on the experimental track. > > > > These differences include abstraction at arbitrary boundaries and IS-IS > extensions for smooth transition to/from zone abstraction. > > > > We are now starting an LSR WG adoption call for > draft-chen-isis-ttz-11.txt. Please indicate your support or objection to > adoption prior to Tuesday, September 2nd, 2020. > > > > Thanks, > > Acee and Chris > > > ___ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
Re: [Lsr] Request WG adaption of TTZ
Support the adaption of the IS-IS TTZ draft. Thanks, Mehmet ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
Re: [Lsr] LSR WG IPR Poll for "IS-IS Topology-Transparent Zone" - draft-chen-isis-ttz.txt
Hi All, I am not aware of any undeclared IPR for this document. With Regards Anil S N On Fri, 21 Aug, 2020, 10:02 LEI LIU, wrote: > I’m not aware of any IPR associated with this draft. > > > > Thanks, > > Best regards, > > > Lei > > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 7:24 AM Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > >> Authors, >> >> >> >> The IETF IPRs declarations submitted for draft-chen-isis-ttz are >> specified here: >> >> >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/4029/ >> >> >> >> >> >> Are you aware of any other IPR that applies to draft-chen-isis-ttz? >> >> >> >> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules >> >> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). >> >> >> >> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond >> >> to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any >> >> relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the LSR WG mailing >> >> list.* The document will not advance to the next stage until a >> >> response has been received from each author and contributor. >> >> >> >> If you are on the LSR WG email list but are not listed as an author or >> >> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of >> >> any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Acee >> > > > > > ___ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
