Aijun -
The point I am making is very focused.
This draft is defining a protocol extension. As such it is necessary that this
be Standards track as adhering to the normative statements in the draft are
necessary for interoperability.
What is discussed in the Appendix is a use case. It is not
Hi Gyan,
Thanks for your review and feedback. Please check inline below.
From: Gyan Mishra
Sent: 16 October 2020 10:11
To: Aijun Wang
Cc: Christian Hopps ; Jeff Tantsura
; John E Drake ;
Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ;
draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org;
I support advancement of the draft.
This draft follows along the lines of ISIS RFC 7794 to provide an extension
to identify the prefix originator attribute using an originating router TLV
and a reachable prefix. A node in ospf is represented by a router-id which
technically can be a random 4
Hi, Les, John and Jeff:
Let's reply you all together.
In my POV, The standard document should not define solely the protocol
extension, but their usages in the network deployment. As I known, almost all
the IETF documents following this style.
And, before adopting one work, we have often
Hi, Chris:
I support the forwarding of this document and as author, I am not aware of
other IPR except the disclosed one.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
-Original Message-
From: lsr-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Christian Hopps
Sent: Thursday,
+1
Regards,
Jeff
> On Oct 15, 2020, at 11:33, John E Drake
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I agree with Les. This is a simple protocol extension for a specific purpose
> and there is no reason to include speculation about its use for other
> purposes, particularly when it is inherently not suited
Hi,
I agree with Les. This is a simple protocol extension for a specific purpose
and there is no reason to include speculation about its use for other purposes,
particularly when it is inherently not suited for them.
Yours Irrespectively,
John
Juniper Business Use Only
> -Original
I support moving this document forward.
Similar functionality in IS-IS has proved useful.
I would however like to repeat comments I made earlier in the review of this
document.
The content of the Appendices should be removed.
The Appendices define and discuss deriving topology information from
Also, speaking as WG member and co-author, I support publication.
Thanks,
Acee
On 10/15/20, 6:12 AM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" wrote:
I am not aware of any IPR.
Thanks,
Acee
On 10/15/20, 2:15 AM, "Christian Hopps" wrote:
This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after
I am not aware of any IPR.
Thanks,
Acee
On 10/15/20, 2:15 AM, "Christian Hopps" wrote:
This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Oct 29th, 2020, for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator/
The following IPR has been filed
Hi Chris,
I support the publication of this document, and as co-author I am not aware of
any undisclosed IPR.
Best regards,
Jie
> -Original Message-
> From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian Hopps
> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 2:15 PM
> To: lsr@ietf.org
>
Hi Chris,
I am not aware of any undisclosed IPRs.
thanks,
Peter
On 15/10/2020 08:15, Christian Hoppsprotocol= application/pgp-signature
wrote:
This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Oct 29th, 2020, for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator/
The
Hello,
I support the progression to publication and as co-author, I am not aware of
any undisclosed IPR.
Thanks,
Ketan
-Original Message-
From: Christian Hopps
Sent: 15 October 2020 11:45
To: lsr@ietf.org
Cc: Christian Hopps ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org;
Yes/support
Regards,
Jeff
> On Oct 14, 2020, at 23:16, Christian Hopps wrote:
>
> This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Oct 29th, 2020, for:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator/
>
> The following IPR has been filed
This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Oct 29th, 2020, for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator/
The following IPR has been filed https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3448/
Authors,
Please indicate to the list, your knowledge of any other IPR related
15 matches
Mail list logo
