Hi Adrian,
In line
Kind Regards
Gyan
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 7:04 AM Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Hi Gyan,
>
>
>
> Sorry, I missed this (got caught on a filter cos it was a bit spammed to a
> lot of lists :-).
>
>
>
> > I have noticed that after reviewing many drafts across many WGs it seems
> in
Yeah, so to give e'one his due, negative disaggregation is Pascal's
brilliant brain-child, I bow to this. And I bow to his patience grinding me
down to convince me the complexity of it is by far outweighted by elegance
it brings to ugly failure repair. Then it took a lot of brow-beating until
Hey Tony,
> people somehow implying a map of RIFT negative disaggregation in
relation to this work
I think those people just made a subtle point that considering IGP alone if
you want to influence your data plane forwarding by advertising PUA in
today's hardware you really need to install more
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 6:27 AM Aijun Wang
wrote:
> Hi, Tony:
>
> Aijun Wang
> China Telecom
>
> On Nov 20, 2020, at 17:45, Tony Przygienda wrote:
>
>
> Yes, acknowledging the idea of negative disaggregation is inspired by RIFT
> work is fine (and normally, when inspired by an idea at least
Les,
Thanks for coordinating the experts and getting this done.
Acee
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)"
Date: Friday, November 20, 2020 at 1:50 PM
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" , Acee
Lindem , Huaimo Chen , Christian
Hopps , Hannes Gredler
Cc: "lsr@ietf.org" , Alvaro Retana
Subject: RE: Early
FYI –
This has been approved by the DEs and IANA has updated the registry.
Les
From: Lsr On Behalf Of Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2020 1:45 PM
To: Acee Lindem (acee) ; Huaimo Chen
; Christian Hopps ; Hannes
Gredler
Cc: lsr@ietf.org; Alvaro Retana
Subject: Re:
Hi, Robert:
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
> On Nov 20, 2020, at 16:10, Robert Raszuk wrote:
>
>
> Gyan,
>
> I like and support your use case #1
>
> For use case #2 I have doubts. Imagine indeed an area which get's partitioned
> such that ABR will loose connectivity to bunch of nodes. Does
Hi, Tony:
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
> On Nov 20, 2020, at 17:45, Tony Przygienda wrote:
>
>
> Yes, acknowledging the idea of negative disaggregation is inspired by RIFT
> work is fine (and normally, when inspired by an idea at least in research
> cycles it is considered basic courtesy to
Yes, acknowledging the idea of negative disaggregation is inspired by RIFT
work is fine (and normally, when inspired by an idea at least in research
cycles it is considered basic courtesy to refer to the according source,
something has been lost more and more in IETF over time I dare to observe
Robert
Let me send it over graphical depiction as a picture is worth a thousand
words should be easy to see the concept.
Trying to keep as simple as possible.
Thanks
Gyan
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 3:03 AM Robert Raszuk wrote:
> Gyan,
>
> I like and support your use case #1
>
> For use case #2
Gyan,
I like and support your use case #1
For use case #2 I have doubts. Imagine indeed an area which get's
partitioned such that ABR will loose connectivity to bunch of nodes. Does
this mean that now such ABR will be blasting globally perhaps 1000s of PUAs
? How would the ABR be able to send
11 matches
Mail list logo
