Re: [Lsr] Why not leverage Network conditions to optimize balancing among multiple App Layer Load Balancers? as proposed by draft-dunbar-lsr-5g-edge-compute-ospf-ext

2021-03-12 Thread Gyan Mishra
Hi Linda On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 3:26 PM Linda Dunbar wrote: > Gyan, > > > > You said: > > * Gyan> The Anycast environments that I have worked with architecture > have been server clusters in data centers geographically diverse that sit > behind a load balancer that uses a concept called HRI

Re: [Lsr] Why not leverage Network conditions to optimize balancing among multiple App Layer Load Balancers? as proposed by draft-dunbar-lsr-5g-edge-compute-ospf-ext

2021-03-12 Thread Linda Dunbar
Gyan, You said: Gyan> The Anycast environments that I have worked with architecture have been server clusters in data centers geographically diverse that sit behind a load balancer that uses a concept called HRI host route injection that if the service is up the VIP is BGP advertised for the

Re: [Lsr] draft-peng-lsr-flex-algo-l2bundles

2021-03-12 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Ran, On 12/03/2021 14:35, chen@zte.com.cn wrote: Hi Peter, Thank you very much for your comments. ##PP as I expressed earlier, my preference would be to keep the flex-algo being based on L3 link information only and not to use L2 link information during the flex-algo computation. 

Re: [Lsr] AD Review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-11

2021-03-12 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Thanks for your review and comments Bruno and Peter for quick resolution. Acee On 3/12/21, 9:20 AM, "bruno.decra...@orange.com" wrote: Hi Peter, > From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] > Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 3:13 PM > > Hi Bruno, > > please see

Re: [Lsr] AD Review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-11

2021-03-12 Thread bruno.decraene
Hi Peter, > From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] > Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 3:13 PM > > Hi Bruno, > > please see inline: > > On 12/03/2021 11:39, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote: > > Peter, Alvaro > > > >> From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] > >> Sent: Thursday, March

Re: [Lsr] AD Review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-11

2021-03-12 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Bruno, please see inline: On 12/03/2021 11:39, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote: Peter, Alvaro From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 11:47 AM [...] ... 221 4.3.  Maximum H.Encaps MSD Type 223   The Maximum H.Encaps MSD Type specifies the

Re: [Lsr] draft-peng-lsr-flex-algo-l2bundles

2021-03-12 Thread chen.ran
Hi Peter, Thank you very much for your comments. ##PPas I expressed earlier, my preference would be to keep the flex-algo being based on L3 link information only and not to use L2 link information during the flex-algo computation. There are other ways to solve your problem. But I

Re: [Lsr] draft-peng-lsr-flex-algo-l2bundles

2021-03-12 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Shaofu, please see inline (##PP): On 12/03/2021 04:26, peng.sha...@zte.com.cn wrote: Hi Peter, Thanks for your important comments. It seems that we have a consensus that the use-case described in the draft is valid. I've heard some people say that flex-algo has already supported this

Re: [Lsr] draft-zhu-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-flexalgo

2021-03-12 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Jie, please see inline: On 12/03/2021 09:03, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote: Hi Peter, Thanks for your comments. Please see some replies inline: -Original Message- From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Peter Psenak Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 5:46 PM To: lsr@ietf.org

Re: [Lsr] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement-05

2021-03-12 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Shraddha, On 11/03/2021 19:16, Shraddha Hegde wrote: I agree problem is valid for networks that use summarization and leaking for inter-domain connectivity. However, I don't think the solution space has to be in IGP. There are various different ways the problem could be solved. A network

Re: [Lsr] AD Review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-11

2021-03-12 Thread bruno.decraene
Peter, Alvaro > From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 11:47 AM [...] > > ... > > 221 4.3.  Maximum H.Encaps MSD Type > > > > 223   The Maximum H.Encaps MSD Type specifies the maximum number > of SIDs > > 224   that can be included as part of the

Re: [Lsr] draft-zhu-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-flexalgo

2021-03-12 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Peter, Thanks for your comments. Please see some replies inline: > -Original Message- > From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Peter Psenak > Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 5:46 PM > To: lsr@ietf.org > Subject: [Lsr] draft-zhu-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-flexalgo > > Dear authors, >