Hi Acee
As an operator, I support adoption of the draft and would like to provide
answers to your questions.
I would like to start by stating that as this is an informational document,
as nothing new is proposed other then the recommendation to use MT for VTN
provisioning as a component of the
Hi, Acee,
Thanks for your understanding about the deployment considerations and the value
of reusing existing technologies when possible.
We have submitted the draft as draft-ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-00 with only the
change in the title and date. And we will expand section 5 and add
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
Title : Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing
based Virtual Transport Network
Authors : Chongfeng
Hi Jie, Chongfeng,
I’ve read draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn and I agree that the combination of MT
and SR could be used to meet a given SLO. Given that I work with products and
customers, I also know there can be a significant time lag for qualification
and deployment of a software version. In
Hi Acee,
I agree with what Chongfeng said about VTN. It refers to a virtual underlay
network with specific topology and resource attributes, and the topology of
VTNs can be specified using multi-topology. It is important to understand the
difference between a VTN and a logical network
Hi, Acee :
We have uploaded the updated version of the PUA draft(
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement)
and think it addressed the issues that discussed on the LSR mailing list.
After presenting this idea several times on the IETF meetings, and
Hi，Acee，
Regarding to the issues put forward in your mail, I'd like to provide some
comments as below,
Q1：I’d like to know of the WG members who supported it, would you really want
to market it as a VTN solution?
[CF]：VTN is defined in draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn, and also used in other
