A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
Title : Flexible Algorithms: Bandwidth, Delay, Metrics and
Constraints
Authors : Shraddha Hegde
Hi Jie,
Please see inline [PSF]
--原始邮件--
发件人：Dongjie(Jimmy)
收件人：彭少富10053815;
抄送人：lsr@ietf.org;cho...@chopps.org;
日 期 ：2021年05月31日 17:35
主 题 ：Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
Advertisement"
Hi PSF,
Please see inline:
>
Hi Shraddha,
My point is that Generic Metric is not a legacy advertisement and it is
application specific. Therefore, the place to advertise it is within the ASLA
Sub-TLV - this applies to both ISIS and OSPF.
The references in RFC8919 and RFC8920 are about legacy advertisements and do
not
Hi PSF,
Please see inline:
> -Original Message-
> From: peng.sha...@zte.com.cn [mailto:peng.sha...@zte.com.cn]
> Sent: Monday, May 31, 2021 9:41 AM
> To: Dongjie (Jimmy)
> Cc: cho...@chopps.org; lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re:[Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency
Hi Ketan,
Pls see inline..
Juniper Business Use Only
From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2021 1:14 PM
To: Shraddha Hegde ; Tony Li
Cc: Acee Lindem (acee) ; lsr@ietf.org;
draft-hegde-lsr-flex-algo-bw-...@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Poll for "Flexible
Hi Shraddha,
When you refer to "a single TE application", it is not clear which one you are
referring to : RSVP-TE or SR Policy?
I believe, for ISIS, you are referring to this specific section of RFC8919 :
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8919#section-6.1
There is no ambiguity here.
