Hi -
On 2022-04-08 12:25 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
...
If you look at the existing YANG RFCs rather than drafts that are confirming to
the error, you'll notice that they don't use the no-zone types:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8344/
...
Huh? RFC 8344 *does* use
See inline.
On 4/8/22, 1:59 PM, "netmod on behalf of Randy Presuhn"
wrote:
Hi -
On 2022-04-08 5:11 AM, Christian Hopps wrote:
..
> Instead, Acee (I'm not sure I'd call him WG B :) is asserting that
> *nobody* actually wanted the current type, and it has been misused
Hi -
On 2022-04-08 5:11 AM, Christian Hopps wrote:
..
Instead, Acee (I'm not sure I'd call him WG B :) is asserting that
*nobody* actually wanted the current type, and it has been misused
everywhere and all over. The vast majority of implementations in
operation probably can't even handle the
From: Lsr on behalf of Joel M. Halpern
Sent: 07 April 2022 18:51
Given that you are asking for an incompatible change to an existing
module, the shoe would seem to be on the other foot.
If you could show it was necessary to make such an incompatible change,
then there would be a difficult
Hello All,
I am not aware of any IPR beyond that which has already been disclosed to the
IETF and is referenced in your email.
Regards
Parag
From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Friday, April 8, 2022 12:40 AM
To: draft-ietf-lsr-ip-flexa...@ietf.org
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr]
Hello Acee and LSR WG
I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this document.
Thanks,
Hugh
From: Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2022 12:22 PM
To: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-reverse-met...@ietf.org
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Working Group Last Call IPR Poll for
Randy Presuhn writes:
Hi -
Let me get this straight. WG A standardized types X and Y years ago,
and support for these has presumably been implemented in some number
of tools, which in turn have been used to develop some unknowable
number of products, whose deployment is even more
Robert Raszuk writes:
Hi Chris,
It seems that there is a subtle but important element on which we may
have different opinion.
You said: "has to deploy new software that contains the new Wizbang
feature, right?"
IMO however we are dealing with case where software already supports
all
Hi Acee,
I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this document.
thanks,
Peter
On 07/04/2022 21:10, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
Authors,
The following IPR has been disclosed:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft=draft-ietf-lsr-ip-flexalgo
Are you aware of any
Hi Acee,
I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this document.
thanks,
Peter
On 07/04/2022 21:21, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
Authors,
There are no IPR disclosures for this draft.
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-lsr-ip-flexalgo-04?
If so, has this IPR been
10 matches
Mail list logo
