Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll Coincident with the Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" - draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt

Hi Acee, I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR that applies to draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt thanks, Zhibo From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2022 1:15 AM To: draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-s...@ietf.org Cc: lsr

Re: [Lsr] Question about draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce

Hi Peter: Please see inline. > -Original Message- > From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2022 11:20 PM > To: Huzhibo > Cc: lsr@ietf.org > Subject: Re: Question about draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce > > Hi Zhibo, > > On 29/07/2022

[Lsr] WG Adoption for RFC8919bis and RFC8920bis

WG Chairs - As discussed during WG meeting at IETF114, authors request WG adoption for draft-ginsberg-lsr-rfc8919bis draft-ppsenak-lsr-rfc8920bis Thanx. Les ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Re: [Lsr] Question about draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce

Hi Zhibo, On 29/07/2022 20:49, Huzhibo wrote: Hi Peter: Supplement to yesterday's online questions, If a node that does not support IP Flexalgo, which has a default route, should the node process the IP Flexalgo prefix as a UPA? - I assume you are talking about the algo 0 default route.

Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll Coincident with the Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" - draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address)

Hi Acee, I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR that applies to draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt thanks, Peter On 29/07/2022 13:18, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: Co-authors, Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt? If so, has this