Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" - draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address)

2022-08-16 Thread Yingzhen Qu
I support progressing this draft. I have the following minor comments for the authors to consider: The title of Section 4 of this draft is “Advertisement of SRH Operation Limits”, and really it only covers the advertisements of MSDs, so may consider to change the title to be consistent with

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" - draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address)

2022-08-16 Thread Chengli (Cheng Li)
I support the publication of the draft. It is happy to see SRv6 basic drafts are going to be published step by step, it helps the industry very much. Respect, Cheng From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2022 1:17 AM To: lsr Cc:

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" - draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address)

2022-08-16 Thread Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong)
Hi WG, I’ve read the document and it introduces reasonable OSPFv3 extensions for SRv6 which is useful for SRv6 deployment. Support publication. Best Xuesong From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2022 1:17 AM To: lsr Cc: