Acee -
I leave it to you and others to work out the optimal OSPF solution.
I only want to emphasize that my concern here is about the state of the LSDB on
nodes other than the restarting router and its neighbor(s).
I think we would like to prevent those routers from ever entering a state where
"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" writes:
Chris -
-Original Message-
From: Christian Hopps
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2023 11:40 PM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Cc: Christian Hopps ; Huaimo Chen
; draft-chen-lsr-isis-big-tlv.auth...@ietf.org;
lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Comments on
On 29/03/2023 10:29, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote:
a)Big TLV does not provide what the draft claims it does
b)Having two ways to do the same thing is undesirable
I can only agree with the above, (b) being the most important.
Peter
___
Lsr mailing
for what's it worth I +1 here Les & Tony obviously
-- tony
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 5:30 PM Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote:
> Chris -
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Christian Hopps
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2023 11:40 PM
> > To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> > Cc: Christian Hopps ;
Chris -
> -Original Message-
> From: Christian Hopps
> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2023 11:40 PM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> Cc: Christian Hopps ; Huaimo Chen
> ; draft-chen-lsr-isis-big-tlv.auth...@ietf.org;
> lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Comments on
Bruno -
I have read your post carefully - but it is still possible that I have
misunderstood some of what you have written. If so, please help correct my
misunderstandings.
Please see my responses inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: bruno.decra...@orange.com
> Sent: Tuesday, March
Supporting incremental upgrading routers in a network, with the understanding
that only the upgraded routers will take advantage of a new feature -- is
normal. In fact, it's what we normally strive for; flag-days are bad.
In any case, there's a pivot here from "this doesn't technically work"
