Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable Prefix Announcement" - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-04 (Fixed draft name)

Dear LSR WG, I object on two basis ... 1) The version -04 does not contain normative MUST that UPA shall only be used to trigger invalidation when end to end encapsulation is used for subject application(s). So as written is in fact quite undeployable in a mixed vendor and legacy node(s)

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable Prefix Announcement" - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-04 (Fixed draft name)

I object. This solution is a poor way of addressing the issues. My reasons have been discussed to death already. Tony > On Aug 23, 2023, at 1:07 PM, Acee Lindem wrote: > > LSR Working Group, > > This begins the working group adoption call for “IGP Unreachable Prefix > Announcement” -

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable Prefix Announcement" - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-04 (Fixed draft name)

I support WG adoption. The problem is a useful problem to solve and the solution defined in the document has been implemented and proven to work. Les > -Original Message- > From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2023 1:07 PM > To: lsr > Cc:

[Lsr] Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable Prefix Announcement" - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-04 (Fixed draft name)

LSR Working Group, This begins the working group adoption call for “IGP Unreachable Prefix Announcement” - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-announce-04. Please indicate your support or objection on this list prior to September 7th, 2023. Thanks, Acee

[Lsr] IPR Poll for Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable Prefix Announcement" - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-04 (Fixed draft name and IPR link)

Co-Authors, Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-posenak-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-04? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). There is one IPR statement -

[Lsr] IPR Poll for Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable Prefix Announcement" - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-04 (Fixed draft name)

Co-Authors, Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-posenak-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-04? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). There are a few IPR statements already -

[Lsr] Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable Prefix Announcement" - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-announce-04

LSR Working Group, This begins the working group adoption call for “IGP Unreachable Prefix Announcement” - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-announce-04. Please indicate your support or objection on this list prior to September 7th, 2023. Thanks, Acee

[Lsr] IPR Poll for Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable Prefix Announcement" - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-announce-04

Co-Authors, Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-posenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-announce-04? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). There are a few IPR statements already -

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang

As a co-author, I support the publication of this draft. I'm not aware of any IPR. Thanks, Yingzhen On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 5:27 PM Christian Hopps wrote: > > This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending Sep 1, 2023, for: > > >

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang

From: Acee Lindem Sent: 21 August 2023 15:52 Hi Tom, Thanks for the review. > On Aug 21, 2023, at 06:57, tom petch wrote: > > From: Lsr on behalf of Christian Hopps > > Sent: 19 August 2023 01:26 > > This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending Sep 1, 2023, for: > >