[Lsr] 答复: New Version Notification for draft-xu-lsr-flooding-reduction-in-clos-01.txt

Hi Tony, I agree that the mesh group feature described in RFC2973 is a relatively simple mechanism to reduce the flooding of LSPs. However, it’s still a little bit complex since 1) it relies on a correct static configuration on all links; 2) it also modifies the behavior in the transmission of

[Lsr] 答复: 答复: WG Adoption Call - draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv (11/17/2023 - 12/09/2023)

Some additional questions: The draft say “The contents of a multi-part TLV MUST be processed as if they were concatenated. If the internals of the TLV contain key information, then replication of the key information should be taken to indicate that subsequent data MUST be processed as if

Re: [Lsr] IETF 118 LSR Minutes

Hi, The meeting minutes have been updated to include the chat history: minutes-118-lsr-202311060830-01.md (ietf.org) Please review and let us know if any changes need to be made. Thanks, Yingzhen On Sun, Nov

Re: [Lsr] IETF 118 LSR Minutes

Les - The LSR WG list is no place to vent on this topic. Open a ticket via supp...@ietf.org. Also, this would be a good issue to raise in your IETF 118 survey response. Acee > On Nov 26, 2023, at 18:29, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote: > > FWIW – > > The new format for the chatlog is much

Re: [Lsr] IETF 118 LSR Minutes

FWIW – The new format for the chatlog is much less readable than previous. Here is the format from IETF 116: Ketan Talaulikar 00:39:39 There is a WG draft for per-algo adj-sid : https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-algorithm-related-adjacency-sid/ If we have large number of links,

Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-xu-lsr-flooding-reduction-in-clos-01.txt

Hey Jeff, Could you be so kind and defined term: "scaled-out leaf-spine fabrics" ? Specifically folks watching us here would highly appreciate if we state max target nodes with vanilla ISIS and max target nodes when your ISIS implementation supports draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding

Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-xu-lsr-flooding-reduction-in-clos-01.txt

I agree with all aforementioned comments. Wrt AI/ML networking - if a controller is used, what is required is link state exposure northbound and not link state protocol in the fabric. (I could argue for RIFT though ;-)) I’d urge you to take a look at Meta’s deployment in their ML clusters

Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-xu-lsr-flooding-reduction-in-clos-01.txt

Speaking as WG member: I agree. The whole Data Center IGP flooding discussion went on years ago and the simplistic enhancement proposed in the subject draft is neither relevant or useful now. Thanks, Acee > On Nov 24, 2023, at 11:55 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > wrote: > > Xiaohu – > I