[Lsr] 答复: New Version Notification for draft-xu-lsr-flooding-reduction-in-clos-01.txt

2023-11-28 Thread xuxiaohu_i...@hotmail.com
Hi Jeff, Open/R (https://engineering.fb.com/2017/11/15/connectivity/open-r-open-routing-for-modern-networks/ ) is actually an in-house link-state routing protocol. The following text is quoted from the above article. "For many years, Facebook has been operating these large-scale fabrics

Re: [Lsr] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-05

2023-11-28 Thread Chongfeng Xie
Hi Daniele, Thanks a lot for your careful review and comments. Please see my replies inline [Chongfeng]: -Original Message- From: Daniele Ceccarelli via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org] Sent: Friday, November 24, 2023 10:21 PM To: rtg-...@ietf.org Cc:

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call - draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv (11/17/2023 - 12/09/2023)

2023-11-28 Thread Tony Przygienda
operational points to understand what support is in network duly noted and yes, yang is probably best angle for now to include the capability per tlv however, some observations below ... On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 2:18 PM wrote: > Hi, > > > > This draft proposes advertisements which are out of

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call - draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv (11/17/2023 - 12/09/2023)

2023-11-28 Thread Tony Li
Hi Aijun, > On Nov 26, 2023, at 7:05 PM, Aijun Wang wrote: > > Some additional questions: > > The draft say “The contents of a multi-part TLV MUST be processed as if they > were concatenated. If the internals of the TLV contain key information, then > replication of the key information

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call - draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv (11/17/2023 - 12/09/2023)

2023-11-28 Thread bruno . decraene
Hi, This draft proposes advertisements which are out of spec from the point of existing RFCs and implementations. Enabling one router to send such advertisement while not all routers are upgraded to support this extension will harm the network, potentially very significantly and likely by

Re: [Lsr] draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv

2023-11-28 Thread bruno . decraene
Les, Thanks for your message and the clarifications. I feel a bit obliged to answer. Please see inline. From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Sent: Friday, November 24, 2023 10:25 PM To: DECRAENE Bruno INNOV/NET ; Tony Li Cc: draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-...@ietf.org; lsr Subject: RE:

Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-xu-lsr-flooding-reduction-in-clos-01.txt

2023-11-28 Thread Vasilenko Eduard
Hi Jeff, 5 topology hops is 5/3->66% worse than 3 hops for latency, reliability, and cost. Why do you assume 5 hops if the needed scale is possible to achieve by 3 hops? In fact, modern 1-ASIC switches (4.8Tbps, 51.2Tbps) permit 390k 100GE end-points for Megafly 3-hops topology (with 50%

Re: [Lsr] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-isis-sr-yang-17

2023-11-28 Thread Yingzhen Qu
Hi Shuping, Thanks for the review. Please see my response below inline. Thanks, Yingzhen On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 12:37 AM Shuping Peng via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Reviewer: Shuping Peng > Review result: Has Issues > > Hello, > > I have been selected as the Routing Directorate

Re: [Lsr] IETF 118 LSR Minutes

2023-11-28 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Dhruv – Thanx for finding this and updating the IETF case – I had looked and indeed saw the issue in the minutes of other WGs. Also thanx to Yingzhen for uploading the chat history – you can now see a more readable format in the LSR Minutes. Les From: Dhruv Dhody Sent: Monday, November