Hi Jia,
Thanks for the review comments.
I see your major comment is about the terminology alignment, as replied to
Daniele, we will follow the decision in TEAS to update the terminologies in
next revision.
Please see some replies to the minor issues inline:
From: He Jia via Datatracker
Tom -
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8665/
And there is a link to it here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ospf/documents/
Not sure why you are having issues.
Les
> -Original Message-
> From: Lsr On Behalf Of tom petch
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 4:02 AM
> To:
A convenient addressee list so top posting my first thoughts on ospf-sr-yang,
I hope to find time to have a more detailed look, at least at ospfv2.
I have looked at ospf-sr-yang and have some queries.
Is this all flavours of SR or just some? Most discussion I see these days
relates to SRv6 I
I look in vain in the datatracker for RFC8665.
Document search finds it, the data tracker does not list it.
I realise that it is not a product of the lsr WG but then neither are RFC9129
or RFC8920 AFAICTand they are listed.
Odd; well, irritating to be precise.
Tom Petch
Hi LSR Chairs,
I would like to ask for an early IANA allocation for the two new prefix
attributes flags as specified at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-01#name-iana-considerations
For ISIS, the allocations of two new Prefix Attributes Flags
Hi LSR Chairs,
I would like to ask for an early IANA allocation for the FAD sub-TLVs as
specified at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-igp-flex-algo-reverse-affinity-01#section-11
There is a shipping implementation of the draft and we would like to
secure the code points
Reviewer: He Jia
Review result: Not Ready
Hello,
I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The
Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as
they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special
request. The
