Hi, Les:Let’s keep the discussions simple.Please answer the following two questions that you haven’t responsed directly in previous mail:1) How the existing point-to-point based solution(RFC9346/RFC5392) solve the broadcast(LAN, A.1 Figure2) inter-AS topology recovery scenario---There are multiple
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-27.txt is now
available. It is a work item of the Link State Routing (LSR) WG of the IETF.
Title: YANG Model for OSPFv3 Extended LSAs
Authors: Acee Lindem
Sharmila Palani
Yingzhen Qu
Name:
Hi Tom.
> On Jan 16, 2024, at 10:26 AM, Acee Lindem wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
>> On Jan 16, 2024, at 06:50, tom petch wrote:
>>
>> From: Acee Lindem
>> Sent: 15 January 2024 20:30
>>
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> Since this YANG model describes the RFC 8362 encodings, those encodings
>> should be the
Hi Acee,
Sounds good!
Regards,Reshad.
On Tuesday, January 16, 2024, 12:45:40 PM EST, Acee Lindem
wrote:
Hi Reshad,
On Jan 16, 2024, at 11:41, Reshad Rahman
wrote:
Hi,
Apologies if this has been discussed before but I didn't follow this document.
- Should interface-id and
The following errata report has been verified for RFC4576,
"Using a Link State Advertisement (LSA) Options Bit to Prevent Looping in
BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)".
--
You may review the report below and at:
The following errata report has been verified for RFC9513,
"OSPFv3 Extensions for Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6)".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7766
--
Status: Verified
Hi Reshad,
> On Jan 16, 2024, at 11:41, Reshad Rahman
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Apologies if this has been discussed before but I didn't follow this document.
>
> - Should interface-id and neighbor-interface-id be of type if:if-index
> instead of uint32? I took a look at RFC8362, still not
Aijun –
Please see inline.
From: Aijun Wang
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2024 12:18 AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; 'Christian Hopps'
; 'Huzhibo'
Cc: 'Acee Lindem' ; 'Yingzhen Qu'
; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: 答复: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call - draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes
(01/05/2024 -
Hi,
Apologies if this has been discussed before but I didn't follow this document.
- Should interface-id and neighbor-interface-id be of type if:if-index instead
of uint32? I took a look at RFC8362, still not clear to me.- Should leaf metric
be of type ospf-metric or ospf-leaf-metric instead of
Hi Tom,
> On Jan 16, 2024, at 06:50, tom petch wrote:
>
> From: Acee Lindem
> Sent: 15 January 2024 20:30
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> Since this YANG model describes the RFC 8362 encodings, those encodings
> should be the primary reference all the leaves and identifies.
>
>
>
> Acee
>
> I think
This Errata is correct and should be accepted.
Thanks,
Acee
> On Jan 16, 2024, at 06:52, RFC Errata System
> wrote:
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9513,
> "OSPFv3 Extensions for Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6)".
>
> --
> You
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9513,
"OSPFv3 Extensions for Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6)".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7766
--
Type: Editorial
From: Acee Lindem
Sent: 15 January 2024 20:30
Hi Tom,
Since this YANG model describes the RFC 8362 encodings, those encodings should
be the primary reference all the leaves and identifies.
Acee
I think that you are wrong. The historian in me knows that given a choice or
primary or
Hi Acee, All,
I have read this document and support its progress.
Regards,
Giuseppe
-Original Message-
From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem
Sent: Monday, January 8, 2024 11:50 PM
To: Lsr
Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "Applicability of IS-IS
Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment
Hi, Les:
-邮件原件-
发件人: forwardingalgori...@ietf.org [mailto:forwardingalgori...@ietf.org]
代表 Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
发送时间: 2024年1月16日 0:16
收件人: Christian Hopps ; Huzhibo
抄送: Acee Lindem ; Yingzhen Qu
; lsr@ietf.org
主题: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call - draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes
15 matches
Mail list logo
