Speaking as WG Member:
My comments have been addressed with this version and I support publication (as
working member).
Speaking as WG Co-Chair:
It would be good for others to review this draft as well (and especially
those writing Flex-Algo
extension drafts). We had limited support (5
Hi Shraddha,
> On Mar 18, 2024, at 6:51 AM, Shraddha Hegde
> wrote:
>
> Acee,
> I read your comment about elephant flow and added below text in sec 4.1.1.2
> “Note that a single elephant flow is normally
>pinned to a single layer-3 interface. If the single layer-3 link
>bandwidth
Hi,
I support the adoption of this draft. It’s a simple and useful extension.
Thanks,
Yuanxiang
-Original Message-
From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 2:43 AM
To: lsr
Cc: draft-chen-lsr-anycast-f...@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for
Hi Acee,
I am not aware of any IPR related to this document.
Thanks,
Ketan
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 12:04 AM Acee Lindem wrote:
> Co-Authors,
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-chen-lsr-anycast-flag?
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see
Hi Acee，
I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft
thanks
Detao Zhao
Original
From: AceeLindem
To: draft-chen-lsr-anycast-f...@ietf.org ;
Cc: lsr ;
Date: 2024年03月20日 02:34
Subject: IPR Poll for WG Adoption for "Updates to Anycast Property
advertisement for OSPFv2" -
+1
The problem can be solved - and in a much more robust way than what is proposed
in the draft - without any protocol extensions.
There is no reason for this draft.
Les
> -Original Message-
> From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 12:50 PM
> To:
This starts the Working Group adoption call for draft-chen-lsr-anycast-flag.
This is a simple OSPFv2 maintenance draft adding an Anycast flag for IPv4
prefixes to align with IS-IS and OSPFv3.
Please send your support or objection to this list before April 6th, 2024.
Thanks,
Acee
Co-Authors,
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-chen-lsr-anycast-flag?
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs
3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond
to this email
Hi,
I have one query regarding the following content from the IGP UPA draft.
As UPA advertisements in IS-IS are advertised in existing Link State
PDUs (LSPs) and the unit of flooding in IS-IS is an LSP, *it is
recommended that, when possible, UPAs are advertised in LSPs
dedicated to
