Re: [Lsr] Comments on draft-zhu-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-flexalgo-07

2024-04-02 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Peter, The E-bit is defined as part of the L2 bundle attribute, which will be used by controller for path computation based on Flex-Algo and the L2 bundle information. This aligns with the usage of IGP L2 bundle. Best regards, Jie From: Peter Psenak Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:06 PM

Re: [Lsr] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-08: (with COMMENT)

2024-04-02 Thread bruno . decraene
Erik, Thank you for your review and comments. Please see inline [Bruno] > -Original Message- > From: Erik Kline via Datatracker > Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2024 9:02 PM > -- >

Re: [Lsr] Is UPA expected to trigger BGP best path calculation?

2024-04-02 Thread Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal
Hi Peter, Thanks for confirming my understanding. Please see inline.. On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 2:07 PM Peter Psenak wrote: > Hi Muthu, > > On 01/04/2024 09:42, Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > Thanks for your response.. > > First, to confirm if I understood correctly: > > The

Re: [Lsr] Comments on draft-zhu-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-flexalgo-07

2024-04-02 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Jie, On 02/04/2024 10:57, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote: Hi Peter, Thanks for the quick reply. Do you mean IGP L2 bundle should be abandoned? Quote from RFC 8668: “If entities external to IS-IS wish to control traffic flows on the individual physical links that comprise the Layer 2 interface

Re: [Lsr] Comments on draft-zhu-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-flexalgo-07

2024-04-02 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Peter, Thanks for the quick reply. Do you mean IGP L2 bundle should be abandoned? Quote from RFC 8668: “If entities external to IS-IS wish to control traffic flows on the individual physical links that comprise the Layer 2 interface bundle, link attribute information about the bundle

Re: [Lsr] Comments on draft-zhu-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-flexalgo-07

2024-04-02 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Jie, On 02/04/2024 10:18, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote: Hi Peter, Please see inline: *From:*Peter Psenak *Sent:* Thursday, March 21, 2024 5:39 PM *To:* Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org; draft-zhu-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-flexalgo.auth...@ietf.org *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] Comments

Re: [Lsr] Comments on draft-zhu-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-flexalgo-07

2024-04-02 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Chris, Sorry for the delayed response. Please see inline: > -Original Message- > From: Christian Hopps > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2024 1:08 AM > To: Dongjie (Jimmy) > Cc: Christian Hopps ; Peter Psenak (ppsenak) > ; Dongjie (Jimmy) > ; lsr@ietf.org; >

Re: [Lsr] Is UPA expected to trigger BGP best path calculation?

2024-04-02 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Muthu, On 01/04/2024 09:42, Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal wrote: Hi Peter, Thanks for your response.. First, to confirm if I understood correctly: The intent of UPA is to provide an event driven signal of the transition of a destination from reachable to unreachable. It is not intended to

Re: [Lsr] Comments on draft-zhu-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-flexalgo-07

2024-04-02 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Les, Sorry for the delayed response. Please see inline: From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2024 1:01 AM To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Peter Psenak (ppsenak) ; Dongjie (Jimmy) ; lsr@ietf.org; draft-zhu-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-flexalgo.auth...@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Lsr] Comments on

Re: [Lsr] Comments on draft-zhu-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-flexalgo-07

2024-04-02 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Peter, Please see inline: From: Peter Psenak Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2024 5:39 PM To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org; draft-zhu-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-flexalgo.auth...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] Comments on draft-zhu-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-flexalgo-07 Hi Jie, On 21/03/2024

Re: [Lsr] Comments on draft-zhu-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-flexalgo-07

2024-04-02 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Gyan, Sorry for the delayed response, please see some replies inline: From: Gyan Mishra Sent: Friday, March 22, 2024 1:04 PM To: Dongjie (Jimmy) Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Peter Psenak ; draft-zhu-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-flexalgo.auth...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] Comments on