Re: [Lsr] AD Review for draft-ietf-ospf-yang-21

Hi Jeff, On 7/1/19, 4:06 PM, "Jeffrey Haas" wrote: On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 03:11:21PM +, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote: > I am firmly on the side of Acee on this one – and I think more attention needs to be paid to his initial answer: “B-F-D”. > > The implications of

Re: [Lsr] AD Review for draft-ietf-ospf-yang-21

21 On July 1, 2019 at 6:58:43 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) (a...@cisco.com<mailto:a...@cisco.com>) wrote: I believe version -23 addresses your comments. It does! I’m starting the IETF LC. Thanks! Alvaro. ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Re: [Lsr] WGLC: draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg (and remaining IPR replies)

The WG last call has concluded. Thanks, Acee On 7/29/19, 1:22 PM, "Christian Hopps" wrote: Hi Folks, As mentioned in the meeting in Montreal, due to mixup (IPR call but no WGLC) the IS-IS yang module was submitted to the IESG prior to a WGLC being done. We are belated

Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01

From: Robert Raszuk Date: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 10:49 AM To: Tony Li Cc: Acee Lindem , "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01 > What would you suggest? How about:

Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01

is-01 Current name: lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis (which has too many “isis” in it as well) Proposed name: lsr-isis-extended-hierarchy Les From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 7:58 AM To: Robert Raszuk ; Tony Li Cc: lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] L

Re: [Lsr] [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-ospf-yang-23.txt

Hi Ravi, Thanks for the review. I’ve incorporated your comments. See inlne. From: rtg-dir on behalf of Ravi Singh Date: Thursday, July 18, 2019 at 10:44 PM To: Routing ADs Cc: Routing Directorate , "draft-ietf-ospf-y...@ietf.org" , "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review:

Re: [Lsr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-yang-23

Hi Erik, Thanks for the review. The nits will be fixed in the -24 version. Thanks, Acee On 7/17/19, 7:08 PM, "Erik Kline via Datatracker" wrote: Reviewer: Erik Kline Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review

Re: [Lsr] AD Review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis-02

Hi Alavaro, From: Lsr on behalf of Alvaro Retana Date: Friday, August 2, 2019 at 11:57 AM To: "draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306...@ietf.org" Cc: "lsr-cha...@ietf.org" , Uma Chunduri , "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: [Lsr] AD Review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis-02 Dear authors: I just finished

Re: [Lsr] Last Call: (YANG Data Model for OSPF Protocol) to Proposed Standard

Hi Tom, On 8/1/19, 11:47 AM, "tom petch" wrote: I have been looking some more at this I-D and have some more doubts and queries. s.2.2 OLD The area and area/interface containers respectively define the OSPF configuration and operational state for OSPF areas

Re: [Lsr] 答复: LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01

it more efficient? 3. Is there any other methods to scale out the IS-IS deployment? Best Regards. Aijun Wang China Telecom 发件人: lsr-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Acee Lindem (acee) 发送时间: 2019年8月12日 22:33 收件人: lsr@ietf.org 主题: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Ca

[Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01

This begins a two week LSR Working Group Adoption Poll for the "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01. The poll will end at 12:00 AM UTC on August 27th, 2019. Please indicate your support of objection on this list prior to the end of the adoption poll. Thanks, Acee

[Lsr] IPR Poll for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01

Authors, Are you aware of any IPR associated with the subject draft. If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email regardless of

Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01

Speaking as WG member: Support adoptions. Thanks, Acee From: Lsr on behalf of Acee Lindem Date: Monday, August 12, 2019 at 5:58 PM To: "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01 This begins a two week LSR

Re: [Lsr] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26: (with COMMENT)

Hi Alissa, On 8/21/19, 4:25 PM, "Alissa Cooper" wrote: Hi Acee, > On Aug 21, 2019, at 1:01 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > > Hi Alissa, > > On 8/21/19, 9:29 AM, "Alissa Cooper via Datatracker" wrote: > >

Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw’s DISCUSS on draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26

Hi Alvaro, Roman, See nits only response. From: Alvaro Retana Date: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 at 11:11 AM To: "draft-ietf-ospf-y...@ietf.org" Cc: Roman Danyliw , Stephane Litkowski , "lsr-cha...@ietf.org" , "lsr@ietf.org" , The IESG Subject: Roman Danyliw’s DISCUSS on

Re: [Lsr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26: (with COMMENT)

Hi Mirja, On 8/20/19, 11:52 AM, "Mirja Kuehlewind" wrote: Hi Acee, Thanks for these changes/additions. One comment below. > On 20. Aug 2019, at 17:05, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > > Hi Mirja, > > On 8/19/19, 12:25

Re: [Lsr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26: (with COMMENT)

Hi Mirja, On 8/19/19, 12:25 PM, "Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker" wrote: Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in

Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw’s DISCUSS on draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26

Subject: RE: Roman Danyliw’s DISCUSS on draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26 Hi Acee! -28 addresses my discuss items and my ballot now reflects that. Thanks much for this iteration and updated text. Regards, Roman From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2019 11:43 AM To:

Re: [Lsr] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Ben, On 8/26/19, 11:11 AM, "Lsr on behalf of Benjamin Kaduk" wrote: Hi Acee, On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 03:02:18PM +0000, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > Hi Ben, > > On 8/22/19, 9:44 PM, "Benjamin Kaduk" wrote: > > On Fr

Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-06: (with DISCUSS)

Hi Roman, Can we clear the DISCUSS on Alvaro’s update? Thanks, Acee From: Alvaro Retana Date: Friday, August 16, 2019 at 10:32 AM To: Roman Danyliw Cc: Acee Lindem , "draft-ietf-ospf-xaf...@ietf.org" , "lsr-cha...@ietf.org" , "lsr@ietf.org" , The IESG Subject: Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's

[Lsr] FW: [IANA #1150448] IANA Request for Early Allocation for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-08

FYI On 8/27/19, 1:59 AM, "Amanda Baber via RT" wrote: Hi all, We've completed the early allocations for draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc. However, per Acee, the descriptions have been updated, and per Alvaro, we've assigned the next available value in the OSPFv3 Prefix Options (8 bits)

[Lsr] "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-08

Authors, Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-08? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email

[Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-08

We’ve gone through a number of iterations with these ELC drafts and I believe they are ready and meets all the use case requirements. Note that “Entropy Label for Spring tunnels” – draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-12 is on the RFC editor’s queue. This begins a two week last call for the

[Lsr] IPR Poll for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label Depth Using IS-IS" - draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

Authors, Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email

[Lsr] IPR Poll for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-08 (Updated Subject)

From: Acee Lindem Date: Friday, August 30, 2019 at 3:06 PM To: "draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-...@ietf.org" Cc: "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-08 Authors, Are you aware of any IPR that applies

[Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using ISIS" - draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

We’ve gone through a number of iterations with these ELC drafts and I believe they are ready and meets all the use case requirements. Note that “Entropy Label for Spring tunnels” – draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-12 is on the RFC editor’s queue. This begins a two week last call for the

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-08

Speaking as a WG member (and someone who has followed this discussion for some time): I support publication of this document. I have a couple minor comments: 1. Please use the US English form of “Signaling” consistently. Right now there is a mix of “Signalling” and “Signaling”. 2. Why

Re: [Lsr] [mpls] Working Group Last Call for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using ISIS" - draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

Speaking a WG member: I support publication. I have the same comments as the OSPF ELC draft. 1. There are a couple instances of “Signalling” here too. 2. Why does this referred to stacked LSPs? I think it could be applicable to a single LSP. 3. In the “Security Considerations”, please

[Lsr] IANA Early Allocation Request for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label Depth Using IS-IS" - draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

We have a request for IANA allocation for this draft from a vendor implementing the draft. Please provide early allocation for the code points. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc/ Thanks, Acee ___ Lsr mailing list

Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw’s DISCUSS on draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26

tf.org" , "lsr@ietf.org" , The IESG Subject: RE: Roman Danyliw’s DISCUSS on draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26 Hi Acee! Thanks for the explanation. More inline … From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 1:51 PM To: Alvaro Retana ; draft-ietf-ospf-y

Re: [Lsr] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-07

Hi. Kathleen, On 8/21/19, 7:42 AM, "Kathleen Moriarty via Datatracker" wrote: Reviewer: Kathleen Moriarty Review result: Has Nits I apologize for the very late review. I see you are already working on Roman's discuss, so perhaps this nit could be addressed still.

Re: [Lsr] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26: (with COMMENT)

Hi Suresh, On 8/22/19, 9:20 AM, "Lsr on behalf of Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker" wrote: Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email

Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

t might be required on a label stack, please make it. Then Uma’s suggestion might make sense. Les From: Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 1:34 PM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Uma Chunduri ; lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07 Hi Les, I think the

Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

-elc-07 Point taken… Les From: Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 1:56 PM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Uma Chunduri ; lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07 Les, Then what you meant in your response was, “generic RLD” as opposed to “generic MSD”. T

Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

Hi Les, I think the question is whether there can be a single RLD depth MSD rather than a RLD solely for entropy label discovery. Thanks, Acee From: Lsr on behalf of "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" Date: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 at 4:29 PM To: Uma Chunduri , "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Lsr]

Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

I know we decided we needed different types of MSD but you’re questioning whether we really need different types of RLD. Forwarding implementors? Thanks, Acee From: Lsr on behalf of Uma Chunduri Date: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 at 2:38 PM To: "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: [Lsr]

Re: [Lsr] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Ben, On 8/22/19, 1:46 AM, "Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker" wrote: Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and

Re: [Lsr] AD Review of draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-35

Hi Alvaro, I see you approved for IESG review. Stephane and I have some more updates in -36 version. See inline. From: Alvaro Retana Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 at 3:29 PM To: "draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-...@ietf.org" , Stephane Litkowski Cc: Yingzhen Qu , "lsr@ietf.org" ,

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-08

and advertised per every local host prefix (link) . Is there any specific reason why link MSD is not considered instead ? ( https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8491) Because the intra-area link topology is not exposed across areas or to other protocols. Thanks, Acee -- Uma C. From: mpls On Behalf Of A

Re: [Lsr] AD Review of draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-35

to:aretana.i...@gmail.com>) wrote: On September 5, 2019 at 3:09:44 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) (a...@cisco.com<mailto:a...@cisco.com>) wrote: Hi! Stephane and I have some more updates in -36 version. I’m ready to start the IETF LC, but there’s one small thing I need you to fix before: rfc29

[Lsr] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-04.txt

Amanda et al, The IGP Flex Algorithm early allocations were made prior to the addition of Prefix Metric as defined in sections 16.3.2. 16.4.2. and 16.4.3 repectively for IS-IS, OSPFv2, and OSPFv3. Can these code points for prefix metric be added to the early allocations? Thanks, Acee On

Re: [Lsr] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-09

Thanks Dhruv for the review... Peter and other authors, Please include Dhruv's comments or respond as to why they are being omitted. Thanks, Acee On 9/12/19, 6:12 AM, "Dhruv Dhody via Datatracker" wrote: Reviewer: Dhruv Dhody Review result: Has Issues Subject: RtgDir

Re: [Lsr] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-08

Thanks Dhruv for the review... Peter and other authors, Please include Dhruv's comments or respond as to why they are being omitted. Thanks, Acee On 9/12/19, 6:06 AM, "Dhruv Dhody via Datatracker" wrote: Reviewer: Dhruv Dhody Review result: Has Issues Subject: RtgDir

Re: [Lsr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-06: (with COMMENT)

Speaking as document shepherd, I agree with Alvaro as to the placement of the normative text. Thanks, ACEE From: Alvaro Retana Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 at 8:54 PM To: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker , Mirja Kühlewind , The IESG Cc: Acee Lindem , "draft-ietf-ospf-xaf...@ietf.org" ,

Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1148306] Early allocations for draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding (Standards Action, IETF Review registries)

Thanks Sabrina! On 7/31/19, 7:51 PM, "Sabrina Tanamal via RT" wrote: Hi all, These early allocations are complete: link-attribute bit values for sub-TLV 19 of TLV 22 (Extended IS reachability TLV) 0x4 Local Edge Enabled for Flooding (LEEF) (TEMPORARY -

Re: [Lsr] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-yang-23

Hi Lada, Thanks for the review - all the nits will be fixed in the -24 version of the draft. Thanks, Acee On 7/23/19, 5:15 PM, "Ladislav Lhotka via Datatracker" wrote: Reviewer: Ladislav Lhotka Review result: Ready with Nits I reviewed already revision 09 of this module

Re: [Lsr] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-06: (with COMMENT)

Hi Eric, On 8/5/19, 7:52 AM, "Éric Vyncke via Datatracker" wrote: Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-06: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and

Re: [Lsr] IETF 105 LSR Working Group Meeting Minutes

r.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-ospf-yang-augmentation-v1/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang/ Thanks, Acee Tom Petch - Original Message - From: "Ac

[Lsr] Early Allocation Request for "Dynamic Flooding on Dense Graphs" - draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding-03

The authors of the subject draft have requested early IANA allocation of the IANA code-points defined in the draft. The LSR chairs and approved the request and are now requesting early allocation. Alvaro (copied) will confirm his approval. Thanks, Acee Lindem LSR Co-Chair

[Lsr] WG Adoption Call: draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv

The LSR working Group adoption call has ended and there was considerable support. Please republish the draft as draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-00.txt. Thanks, Chris and Acee ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

[Lsr] IETF 105 LSR Working Group Meeting Minutes

I think we had some very good discussions in our sessions this week. I’ve uploaded the minutes for the both LSR sessions on Monday. Thanks much to Yingzhen Qu for taking them. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/materials/minutes-105-lsr-00 Thanks, Acee

Re: [Lsr] [Idr] draft-merciaz-idr-bgp-bfd-strict-mode

Hi Albert, Ketan, The authors will document dampening in the operational considerations. I’m also of the mind that the dampening should be done in BFD rather than the BFD clients (e.g., BGP). Thanks, Acee From: Lsr on behalf of Albert F Date: Thursday, July 25, 2019 at 5:14 PM To: "Ketan

Re: [Lsr] [Idr] draft-merciaz-idr-bgp-bfd-strict-mode

ent for each client of the BFD session. If that is a plausible use case, I think that placing dampening to a client may be a better choice. Regards, Greg On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 6:23 PM Acee Lindem (acee) mailto:a...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi Albert, Ketan, The authors will document dampening in

Re: [Lsr] Regd covering BGP-LS extensions for IGP ELC drafts

as anyone heard if Chris Hopps is a father yet? Not yet. Thanks, Acee From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 6:43 PM To: Acee Lindem (acee); lsr@ietf.org Cc: i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-...@ietf.org Subje

Re: [Lsr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-37

Thanks Stewart - we will fix this nit in the -38 version. Acee On 9/18/19, 10:14 AM, "Stewart Bryant via Datatracker" wrote: Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews

Re: [Lsr] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-37: (with COMMENT)

Hi Alvaro, Co-authors, et al, I went ahead and changed to “should” for the YANG deviations as well as fixing a couple typos and changing the draft short name from “isis-cfg” to “isis-yang”. The -40 version is posted. Thanks, Acee From: Acee Lindem Date: Friday, September 27, 2019 at 8:30 AM

Re: [Lsr] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-37: (with COMMENT)

Hi Barry, Thanks for your review - I've published the -38 version incorporating all your comments and Stewart Bryant's comments in order to avoid duplicates from other reviewers. I did take a pass over the document and added some additional articles. Thanks, Acee On 9/26/19, 1:37 AM, "Barry

Re: [Lsr] [mpls] Working Group Last Call for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using ISIS" - draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

The Working Group last call has completed and we have received IPR responses from all the authors. We have some comments from the Routing Directorate review. I will request publication of the version addressing these comments. Thanks, Acee From: mpls on behalf of Acee Lindem Date: Friday,

Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01

Authors, The LSR Working Group Adoption Call has ended and there is sufficient support and interest in working on this draft here in LSR. Please republish the draft as draft-ietf-lsr-isis-extended-hierarchy-00.txt as we agreed during the discussion initiated by Robert Raszuk during the adoption

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-08

The Working Group last call has completed and we have received IPR responses from all the authors. We have some comments from the Routing Directorate review on the corresponding IS-IS draft. I will hold off requesting publication in case the comments are also applicable to this version. Thanks,

Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label Depth Using IS-IS" - draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

Cc: "lsr@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-isis-mpls-...@ietf.org" Subject: RE: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label Depth Using IS-IS" - draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07 Acee, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft

Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label Depth Using IS-IS" - draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

Clarence and Xiaohu (Tiger) – I still need responses to the IPR poll… Tiger – you replied to the poll for the OSPF ELC draft but not the IS-IS ELC draft. Thanks, Acee From: Lsr on behalf of Acee Lindem Date: Friday, August 30, 2019 at 3:11 PM To: "draft-ietf-isis-mpls-...@ietf.org" Cc:

Re: [Lsr] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-08

Dhruv - thanks much for the review. Authors - can you address Dhruv's comments? Thanks, Acee On 9/12/19, 6:06 AM, "Dhruv Dhody via Datatracker" wrote: Reviewer: Dhruv Dhody Review result: Has Issues Subject: RtgDir Early review: draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-08 Hello

Re: [Lsr] "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-08

Clarence – I still need a response to the IPR poll. Thanks, Acee From: Lsr on behalf of Acee Lindem Date: Friday, August 30, 2019 at 3:07 PM To: "draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-...@ietf.org" Cc: "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: [Lsr] "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for draft-acee-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-06

Speaking as co-author, I support this draft. It is required for all OSPFv3 extensions utilizing RFC8362 extended LSA encodings. Additionally, I'm not aware of any IPR. Thanks, Acee On 10/2/19, 5:27 PM, "Lsr on behalf of Christian Hopps" wrote: Hi Folks, This begins a 2 week WG

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption poll for draft-acee-lsr-ospf-yang-augmentation-v1-01

Speaking as a co-author, I support this draft. When we froze the features in the base OSPF YANG model so it could be published, we committed to supporting new RFCs and drafts in separate model in a new draft. I don't know of any IPR. Thanks, Acee On 10/2/19, 5:29 PM, "Lsr on behalf of

Re: [Lsr] [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-10

Hi Alvaro, On 11/7/19, 11:58 AM, "Alvaro Retana" wrote: On November 3, 2019 at 2:28:29 PM, Padma Pillay-Esnault wrote: Padma: Hi! See below... > On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 7:03 PM Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 03:50:45PM -0700, Padma

Re: [Lsr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-10

HI Padma, Mohit, From: Padma Pillay-Esnault Date: Thursday, October 31, 2019 at 2:17 PM To: Mohit Sethi Cc: "gen-...@ietf.org" , "last-c...@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit@ietf.org" , "lsr@ietf.org" , Padma Pillay-Esnault Subject: Re: Genart last call review of

Re: [Lsr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-10

See one inline. From: Acee Lindem Date: Thursday, October 31, 2019 at 2:39 PM To: Padma Pillay-Esnault , Mohit Sethi Cc: "gen-...@ietf.org" , "last-c...@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit@ietf.org" , "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: Re: Genart last call review of

[Lsr] "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" - draft-li-ospf-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-07 Questions/Comments

Hi Authors, I know you have asked for adoption and I have some comments on the draft. I think these need to be addressed or at least answered prior to any LSR adoption call. In my opinion, this document is not ready. 1. Why do you define a separate SRv6 Locator LSA to advertise SRv6

Re: [Lsr] "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" - draft-li-ospf-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-07 Questions/Comments

xtensions-07 Questions/Comments Hi Acee, Thanks for your review and comments. Please check inline below. From: Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: 18 November 2019 06:18 To: draft-li-ospf-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org Cc: lsr@ietf.org Subject: "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" - draft-li-ospf-ospfv3-srv

[Lsr] OSPF/IS-IS Segment Routing RFCs - MPLS Dataplane

The OSPF/IS-IS Segment Routing drafts have been published as RFCs. There’s been a lot of iterations and work done here and I’d like to recognize the occasion as well as congratulate the authors. OSPF Segment Rouing - https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8665 OSPFv3 Segment Routing –

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric

Speaking as a WG member, I support WG adoption. Thanks, Acee On 12/13/19, 6:29 AM, "Lsr on behalf of Christian Hopps" wrote: Hi LSR WG and Draft Authors, This begins a 2 week WG adoption poll for the following draft:

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

Speaking as a WG member, I support WG adoption. Thanks, Acee On 12/13/19, 6:55 AM, "Lsr on behalf of Christian Hopps" wrote: Hi LSR WG and Draft Authors, This begins a 2 week WG adoption poll for the following draft:

Re: [Lsr] "YANG Module for IS-IS Reverse Metric" - draft-hopps-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-02

The WG adoption poll has ended and the draft has been accepted. Chris – please republish as draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-00.txt. Thanks, Acee From: Lsr on behalf of Acee Lindem Date: Monday, November 25, 2019 at 7:27 AM To: "lsr@ietf.org" Cc: Christian Hopps Subject: [Lsr] "YANG

[Lsr] IETF 106 LSR Working Group Meeting Minutes

I’ve uploaded the IETF 106 LSR minutes at https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/materials/minutes-106-lsr-00 Please send me any additions or corrections. Thanks much to Yingzhen Qu for compiling the minutes. As you can see, we had quite a lot of lively discussion during the sessions –

Re: [Lsr] some doubts about RFC3101

. It maybe fall under a configed error, but the result of the calculate result seems wrong. What is your opinion for it? Regards 发件人: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] 发送时间: 2019年12月5日 20:40 收件人: meicong ; lsr@ietf.org 主题: Re: [Lsr] some doubts about RFC3101 Hi Meicong, From: Lsr mailt

Re: [Lsr] some doubts about RFC3101

Hi Meicong, From: Lsr on behalf of meicong Date: Thursday, December 5, 2019 at 4:48 AM To: "lsr@ietf.org" Cc: "draft-ietf-ospf-nssa-upd...@ietf.org" Subject: [Lsr] some doubts about RFC3101 Hi All, Could you please provide clarification for following section 2.5.(3) in rfc3101.

[Lsr] IPR Call for New Co-authors of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-11.txt - "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF" (And this one)

New Author and Contributors, Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-11? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to

[Lsr] IPR Call for New Co-authors of draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-10.txt - "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using IS-IS" (Reply to this one)

New Author and Contributors, Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-10? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to

[Lsr] IPR Call for New Co-authors of draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-10.txt - "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF"

New Author and Contributors, Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to

[Lsr] IPR Call for New Co-authors of draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-10.txt - "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF" (Corrected)

New Author and Contributors, Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-11? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to

Re: [Lsr] IPR Call for New Co-authors of draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-10.txt - "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF" (Corrected)

Antwerp)" Date: Monday, October 21, 2019 at 9:03 AM To: "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" , "Acee Lindem (acee)" , "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" , Keyur Patel Cc: "lsr@ietf.org" , Alvaro Retana Subject: Re: IPR Call for New Co-authors of dr

Re: [Lsr] IPR Call for New Co-authors of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-11.txt - "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF" (And this one)

BE/Antwerp)" Date: Monday, October 21, 2019 at 9:04 AM To: "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" , "Acee Lindem (acee)" Cc: "lsr@ietf.org" , Alvaro Retana , "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" , Keyur Patel Subject: Re: IPR Call for New Co-a

Re: [Lsr] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-41: (with COMMENT)

Hi Ben, Thanks again for the detailed review. I've made the editorial changes below in the -42 version. Thanks, Acee On 10/15/19, 1:38 AM, "Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker" wrote: Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-41: No

[Lsr] "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF" IPR

All, I you were paying attention, you noticed that publication was requested for both the OSPF and IS-IS Entropy Label signaling drafts. During the review, we found the IPR statement was missing from the OSPF draft in the data tracker. This was an oversite on my part as the “Replaces”

[Lsr] Early Allocation request for "OSPF Prefix Originator Extension" - draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-04

Hi Amanda, et al, We have some implementation momentum and wish to request early IANA allocation for OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 code points in the subject draft. Thanks, Acee ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

[Lsr] "YANG Module for IS-IS Reverse Metric" - draft-hopps-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-02

This begins a two week LSR Working Group adoption call for the subject document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hopps-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric/ Please indicate your support or objection to adoption to the LSR list (lsr@ietf.org) prior to 12:00 AM UTC on December

Re: [Lsr] draft-hopps-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-02

Hi Tom, I agree with your comments. I'm going to start a WG adoption poll on this document as it is pretty straight-forward. See one inline. On 11/24/19, 2:44 AM, "Lsr on behalf of tom petch" wrote: Christian Some stray thoughts /intermediate system

[Lsr] IPR Poll on "YANG Module for IS-IS Reverse Metric" - draft-hopps-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-02

Authors, Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-hopps-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-02? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to

Re: [Lsr] "YANG Module for IS-IS Reverse Metric" - draft-hopps-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-02

Speaking as a WG member, I support adoption. Thanks, Acee From: Lsr on behalf of Acee Lindem Date: Monday, November 25, 2019 at 7:27 AM To: "lsr@ietf.org" Cc: Christian Hopps Subject: [Lsr] "YANG Module for IS-IS Reverse Metric" - draft-hopps-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-02 This begins a

Re: [Lsr] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-40: (with COMMENT)

Hi Adam, Thanks for review. On 10/2/19, 6:31 PM, "Adam Roach via Datatracker" wrote: Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-40: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email

Re: [Lsr] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-40: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Ben, Thanks for the excellent review - see one inline. On 10/8/19, 6:13 AM, "Benjamin Kaduk" wrote: Hi Stephane, Thanks for pulling in the fixes; just a few notes inline (and trimming)... On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 10:33:49AM +0200, slitkows.i...@gmail.com wrote: >

Re: [Lsr] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-40: (with COMMENT)

o range u16 or a 1..max range? > Thanks, > Chris. > >> On Oct 7, 2019, at 12:44 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: >> >>> grouping spf-parameters { >>>container spf-control { >>>leaf paths { >>>

Re: [Lsr] Question about OSPF (transit area routing loop)

Hi Sergey, I don’t see why RT_1 wouldn’t go through ABR_1 to get to the ASBR. Thanks, Acee From: Lsr on behalf of Sergey SHpenkov Date: Tuesday, February 25, 2020 at 2:38 PM To: "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: [Lsr] Question about OSPF (transit area routing loop) Hi, In section 16.3 of the OSPF RFC

Re: [Lsr] 答复: IETF 107 LSR Presentation Slot Requests

Yali – Can you give an overview on the list as well? Thanks, Acee From: wangyali Date: Friday, February 28, 2020 at 10:03 PM To: "lsr-cha...@ietf.org" , "lsr@ietf.org" Cc: Yingzhen Qu Subject: 答复: [Lsr] IETF 107 LSR Presentation Slot Requests Resent-From: Resent-To: Acee Lindem , Yingzhen Qu

Re: [Lsr] AD Review of draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-10

Authors Dearest, Please update all the out-of-date references and the copyright date to 2020. This will resolve the Nits. https://www6.ietf.org/tools/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-10.txt Thanks, Acee (speaking as document shepherd) On 2/29/20, 12:00

Re: [Lsr] IETF 107 LSR Presentation Slot Requests

Caught me just in time asking about this  Acee From: Linda Dunbar Date: Monday, March 2, 2020 at 1:57 PM To: Yingzhen Qu Cc: "lsr@ietf.org" , "lsr-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: RE: [Lsr] IETF 107 LSR Presentation Slot Requests Resent-From: Resent-To: Christian Hopps , Acee Lindem , Yingzhen Qu

Re: [Lsr] Question about OSPF (transit area routing loop)

г. в 22:44, Acee Lindem (acee) mailto:a...@cisco.com>>: Hi Sergey, I don’t see why RT_1 wouldn’t go through ABR_1 to get to the ASBR. Thanks, Acee From: Lsr mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of Sergey SHpenkov mailto:sergey.v.shpen...@gmail.com>> Date: Tuesday, Februar

Re: [Lsr] Question about OSPF (transit area routing loop)

the calculation begins on the router ABR_3 16.3. It is a bad idea? :) Thansk, Sergey пн, 2 мар. 2020 г. в 00:51, Acee Lindem (acee) mailto:a...@cisco.com>>: Hi Sergey, Seems it is a real problem that needs a solution. Let’s continue the discussion. Thanks, Acee From: Sergey SHpenkov

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >