Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

2020-12-11 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Robert, Please see inline: From: Robert Raszuk [mailto:rob...@raszuk.net] Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 5:16 PM To: Dongjie (Jimmy) Cc: Peter Psenak ; Acee Lindem (acee) ; lsr Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks&quo

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

2020-12-11 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Peter, > -Original Message- > From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2020 9:22 PM > To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Acee Lindem (acee) > ; lsr > Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms > (Flex-Algorithm)

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

2020-12-10 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Peter, > -Original Message- > From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2020 5:05 PM > To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Acee Lindem (acee) > ; lsr > Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms > (Flex-Algorithm)

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

2020-12-10 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Peter, > -Original Message- > From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2020 9:06 PM > To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Acee Lindem (acee) > ; lsr > Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms > (Flex-Algorith

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

2020-12-09 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
] Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2020 6:46 PM To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Acee Lindem (acee) ; lsr Subject: RE: WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 IP Algorithm SUBTLV indicate the participation for particular flex alg

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

2020-12-09 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Peter, > -Original Message- > From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2020 6:45 PM > To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Acee Lindem (acee) > ; lsr > Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms > (Flex-Algorith

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

2020-12-09 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi authors, Here is one comment following the previous discussion on the mail list and the IETF meeting. The IP Algorithm TLV is defined to advertise the IP Flex-Algorithm participation information, there is no separate TLV for IPv4 or IPv6 Flex-Algo participation. If some nodes participate

Re: [Lsr] IETF I09 LSR Meeting Minutes

2020-11-23 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Acee, One small nit about the minutes for the first topic: Peter: I commented earlier. The way the total constaints are being used. Basically a bundle must advertise the summary of all the included affinities of the individual members, can't use an exclude

Re: [Lsr] 回复: New Version Notification for draft-zhu-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-flexalgo-01.txt

2020-10-25 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
...@ietf.org<mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org> mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org>> 发送时间: 2020年9月11日 17:11 收件人: Dongjie (Jimmy) mailto:jie.d...@huawei.com>>; Yongqing Zhu mailto:zhu...@chinatelecom.cn>>; Huzhibo mailto:huzh...@huawei.com>> 主题: New Version Notification

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-15 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Chris, I support the publication of this document, and as co-author I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR. Best regards, Jie > -Original Message- > From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian Hopps > Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 2:15 PM > To: lsr@ietf.org >

Re: [Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-00.txt

2020-10-14 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Robert and Peter, > -Original Message- > From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Peter Psenak > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 7:55 PM > To: Robert Raszuk > Cc: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Gyan Mishra > ; Ron Bonica ; lsr@ietf.org; > Jeff Tantsura ; Yingzhe

Re: [Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-00.txt

2020-10-14 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Peter, > -Original Message- > From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 4:53 PM > To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Ron Bonica > ; Yingzhen Qu ; Gyan > Mishra > Cc: lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura > Subject: Re: [Lsr] FW: New Version

Re: [Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-00.txt

2020-10-13 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Peter, Thanks for your reply. Please see further inline: > -Original Message- > From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Peter Psenak > Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 4:39 PM > To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Ron Bonica > ; Yingzhen Qu ; Gyan > Mishra > C

Re: [Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-00.txt

2020-10-12 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
ctober 11, 2020 3:14 AM > To: Ron Bonica > Cc: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Peter Psenak > ; Yingzhen Qu ; Gyan > Mishra ; lsr@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for > draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-00.txt > > Jie, > > The scoop is different, for SR data pla

Re: [Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-00.txt

2020-10-12 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Ron, Please see inline: > -Original Message- > From: Ron Bonica [mailto:rbon...@juniper.net] > Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2020 8:48 PM > To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Peter Psenak > ; Yingzhen Qu ; Gyan > Mishra > Cc: lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura > Subject: R

Re: [Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-00.txt

2020-10-09 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
-128 to IP address? If so, how could this node know the binding of FA to different data planes on other nodes? Best regards, Jie > -Original Message- > From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Peter Psenak > Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 11:58 PM > To: Dongjie (

Re: [Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-00.txt

2020-10-08 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Ron, Thanks for explaining the difference between IP Flex-Algo and SR Flex-algo. As you said, the major difference is the data plane. If my understanding is correct, for one Flex-Algo to be used correctly, the set of nodes need to apply consistent constraints in computation, and bind the

Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-00.txt

2020-09-30 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi, While it is possible to define algorithm-specific IP reachability TLVs to advertise IP Prefixes associated with different algorithms, this would introduce several new IS-IS top TLVs. One quick question is: can similar function be provided with extensions to existing IP reachability TLVs

Re: [Lsr] 回复: New Version Notification for draft-zhu-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-flexalgo-01.txt

2020-09-16 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Peter, Please see some replies inline: > -Original Message- > From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 6:18 PM > To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; zhu...@chinatelecom.cn; > lsr@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Lsr] 回复: New Version Notificati

Re: [Lsr] 回复: New Version Notification for draft-zhu-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-flexalgo-01.txt

2020-09-16 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
s-sr-vtn-flexalgo. This > document specifies a mechanism to use Flex-Algo together with small extensions > to IS-IS L2 bundle to distribute the topology and resource attribute of SR > based > VTN. Your review and comments are appreciated. > > B.R. > > Zhu Yongqing > &g

Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Poll for "IS-IS Topology-Transparent Zone" - draft-chen-isis-ttz-11.txt

2020-08-31 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
I support the adoption of this document. Best regards, Jie From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 10:17 PM To: lsr@ietf.org Subject: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Poll for "IS-IS Topology-Transparent Zone" - draft-chen-isis-ttz-11.txt

Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network

2020-03-31 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Les, Please see my reply inline: -Original Message- From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 12:17 AM To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Peter Psenak ; xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr Subject: RE: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment

Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing basedVirtual Transport Network

2020-03-30 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
[mailto:rob...@raszuk.net] Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 6:21 PM To: Dongjie (Jimmy) Cc: peng.sha...@zte.com.cn; Aijun Wang ; xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing basedVirtual Transport Network Hi, Out of pure curiosity here

Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network

2020-03-30 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Les, Thanks for your review and comments. Please see my replies inline with [Jie]: -Original Message- From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 3:06 PM To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Peter Psenak ; xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr Subject: RE: [Lsr

Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network

2020-03-29 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
, March 28, 2020 1:12 AM To: Peter Psenak ; Dongjie (Jimmy) ; xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr Subject: RE: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network Jie - The registry clearly indicates the set of specifications - and does so on a per sub-TLV basis

Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network

2020-03-29 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Peter, Thanks for your reply, please see inline with [Jie 3]: -Original Message- From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 11:45 PM To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr Subject: Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment

Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network

2020-03-27 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
27, 2020 4:11 PM To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr Subject: Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network Hi Dongjie, On 27/03/2020 07:56, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote: > Hi Peter, > > You missed some of my comments in prev

Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network

2020-03-27 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
gards, Jie -Original Message- From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com] Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 12:05 AM To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Peter Psenak ; xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr Subject: RE: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Netwo

Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network

2020-03-27 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
ak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2020 7:03 PM To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr Subject: Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network Hi Dongjie, On 26/03/2020 11:57, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote: > Hi Peter, > >

Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network

2020-03-26 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Peter, Thanks for your comments. > -Original Message- > From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2020 5:23 PM > To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr > > Subject: Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Seg

Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network

2020-03-26 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Peter, As described in the abstract, the purpose of this draft is to define a simplified control plane mechanism to build SR based Virtual Transport Network (VTN), it is based on the combination of IS-IS Multi-Topology with other IS-IS extensions, e.g. the extensions for TE, SR and L2

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-02-03 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
I support progressing this draft. Best regards, Jie > -Original Message- > From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian Hopps > Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2020 8:15 AM > To: lsr@ietf.org > Cc: lsr-...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps ; Acee Lindem > (acee) > Subject: [Lsr]

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions

2020-02-03 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Peter, Thanks for your reply. Please see inline: > -Original Message- > From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] > Sent: Monday, February 3, 2020 5:08 PM > To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Acee Lindem (acee) > ; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; > li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com; Chr

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions

2020-02-01 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Ketan, I agree the text proposed by Acee is better. In the flex-algo draft, there is no description of "specific algorithm topologies". OTOH, Flex-algo can specify the constraints on particular topologies. Best regards, Jie > -Original Message- > From: Lsr

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Call for "IS-IS Extensions to Support Routing over IPv6 Dataplane" - draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-05.txt

2019-05-09 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Support the adoption of this draft. Best regards, Jie From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2019 5:50 PM To: lsr@ietf.org Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Call for "IS-IS Extensions to Support Routing over IPv6 Dataplane" -

[Lsr] 答复: Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

2019-02-20 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Yes, I support the adoption. Best regards, Jie 发件人: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Acee Lindem (acee) 发送时间: 2019年2月13日 21:26 收件人: lsr@ietf.org 主题: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01 This begins a two

[Lsr] 答复: 答复: WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR poll.

2019-02-13 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
+1. Support to start the adoption poll on both drafts. -Jie > -邮件原件- > 发件人: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Aijun Wang > 发送时间: 2019年2月14日 10:38 > 收件人: 'Christian Hopps' ; lsr@ietf.org > 抄送: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org > 主题: [Lsr] 答复: WG Adoption Call for

Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll on "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

2019-02-12 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Acee, I'm not aware of any IPR other than the one referenced below. Best regards, Jie 发件人:Acee Lindem (acee) 收件人:Aijun Wang ;draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-...@ietf.org 抄 送:lsr@ietf.org 时间:2019-02-13 10:07:46 主 题:Re: 答复: [Lsr] IPR Poll on "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" -

Re: [Lsr] 答复: Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction Draft Redux]

2019-02-11 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Support moving forward with the centralized and distributed solutions specified in separated drafts. As discussed in previous mails, the procedure and protocol extensions needed for the two modes could be different, and a particular network may only want to use one mode. As for the centralized

Re: [Lsr] LSR: Using DSCP for path/topology selection Q

2018-11-19 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Les, Thanks for the summary and citations. To my understanding, although DSCP based steering could be used in multi-topology scenarios, such usage is not defined in IETF specifications. Actually there can be many ways of choosing which topology is used for the forwarding of a particular

Re: [Lsr] LSR: Using DSCP for path/topology selection Q

2018-11-19 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Agreed, DSCP was designed for DiffServ QoS marking to differentiate a limited number of service classes, it may not be suitable for non-Diffserv QoS scenarios. Best regards, Jie From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Tantsura Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 4:15 PM To:

Re: [Lsr] 答复: 答复: 答复: Regarding OSPF extension for inter-area topology retrieval

2018-07-25 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
jun Wang ; 'Rob Shakir' > > Cc: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; cho...@chopps.org; lsr@ietf.org > Subject: Re: 答复: [Lsr] 答复: 答复: Regarding OSPF extension for inter-area > topology retrieval > > Hi Ketan, > > On 7/24/18, 7:44 AM, "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" wrote: > >

[Lsr] FW: I-D Action: draft-dong-lsr-sr-enhanced-vpn-00.txt

2018-06-29 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
FYI we have submitted a draft on the IGP extensions for SR based enhanced VPN. Comments are welcome. Best regards, Jie -Original Message- From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 12:06 AM To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org Subject: I-D

Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Poll for Flex Algorithm Drafts

2018-04-21 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Les, Thanks for your comments and analysis. Please see my replies inline: > -Original Message- > From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com] > Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2018 1:44 AM > To: Peter Psenak (ppsenak) <ppse...@cisco.com>; Dongjie (Jimmy) >

Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Poll for Flex Algorithm Drafts

2018-04-20 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
t; To: Peter Psenak (ppsenak) <ppse...@cisco.com>; Dongjie (Jimmy) > <jie.d...@huawei.com>; lsr@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Poll for Flex Algorithm Drafts > > Hi Jie, Peter, > > Another difference with Multiple Topology Router (MTR) is that

Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Poll for Flex Algorithm Drafts

2018-04-20 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Peter, Please see inline: > -Original Message- > From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] > Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 5:34 PM > To: Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.d...@huawei.com>; Acee Lindem (acee) > <a...@cisco.com>; lsr@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Lsr] L

Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Poll for Flex Algorithm Drafts

2018-04-20 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Peter, Please see inline: > -Original Message- > From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] > Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 3:31 PM > To: Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.d...@huawei.com>; Acee Lindem (acee) > <a...@cisco.com>; lsr@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Lsr] L

Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Poll for Flex Algorithm Drafts

2018-04-19 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Peter, Thanks for the prompt response. Please see inline: > -Original Message- > From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2018 4:28 PM > To: Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.d...@huawei.com>; Acee Lindem (acee) > <a...@cisco.com>; lsr@i