Re: [Lsr] Comments on draft-li-ospf-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-07.txt

[Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)]

Hi Acee,

Thanks for your review, comments and suggestions. We’ve incorporated them and 
posted an update for this draft.

Note that as requested in a separate email thread, the draft has been renamed 
so it is associated with the LSR WG instead of the old OSPF one : 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions/

This draft also has editorial changes to align with the latest version of the 
draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming and is functionally equivalent to 
the draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions.

The authors believe this version is ready for WG adoption as requested 
previously.

Thanks,
Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)

From: Lizhenbin 
Sent: 16 December 2019 20:31
To: Acee Lindem (acee) ; 
draft-li-ospf-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Comments on draft-li-ospf-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-07.txt

Hi Acee,
Thanks very much for your help to refine the draft. You suggestion also makes 
sense. We will update accordingly.

Best Regards,
Robin



From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 5:44 AM
To: 
draft-li-ospf-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Comments on draft-li-ospf-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-07.txt

Hi Robin, et al,
One thing I’d like to see is incorporation of the text for the MSD types in the 
draft. It is less than one and a half pages and it doesn’t make sense to 
reference the IS-IS draft. I’ve also attached my editorial comments.

Thanks,
Acee
___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Re: [Lsr] Comments on draft-li-ospf-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-07.txt

[Lizhenbin]

Hi Acee,
Thanks very much for your help to refine the draft. You suggestion also makes 
sense. We will update accordingly.

Best Regards,
Robin



From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 5:44 AM
To: draft-li-ospf-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Comments on draft-li-ospf-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-07.txt

Hi Robin, et al,
One thing I’d like to see is incorporation of the text for the MSD types in the 
draft. It is less than one and a half pages and it doesn’t make sense to 
reference the IS-IS draft. I’ve also attached my editorial comments.

Thanks,
Acee
___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr