Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1171772] Early Allocations request for "Area Proxy for IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy-04

er via RT > Sent: Monday, June 01, 2020 6:13 PM > To: Acee Lindem (acee) > Cc: lsr@ietf.org; martin.vigour...@nokia.com > Subject: [Lsr] [IANA #1171772] Early Allocations request for "Area Proxy for > IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy-04 > > Hi Acee, Martin,

Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1171772] Early Allocations request for "Area Proxy for IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy-04

Amanda, Thanks, for the clarification. I have not had to manage code point allocation for Expert Review registries and had not looked at 7370. Small question, if you do the hybrid early allocation and then 6 months later the document is is approved as an RFC is that the time when you mark t

[Lsr] [IANA #1171772] Early Allocations request for "Area Proxy for IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy-04

Hi Loa, all, A note about this: > Yeah - you are requesting code points from registries where the > registration procedures are "Expert Review". But those are not early > allocation, they are permanent. There is a kind of hybrid early allocation/Expert Review procedure for the IS-IS Exert Revie

Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1171772] Early Allocations request for "Area Proxy for IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy-04

Hi Amanda, > However, the IANA Considerations section is missing some information. How > would we fill in the IIH, LSP, SNP, and Purge fields for the TLV Codepoint > registrations? We’ve addressed this in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy-06

[Lsr] [IANA #1171772] Early Allocations request for "Area Proxy for IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy-04

Hi Acee, Martin, We've sent this request to the IS-IS experts for review in accordance with the RFC 7370 early allocation procedure for IS-IS Expert Review registries. We understand that if the experts approve, we would make three early/temporary registrations in the TLV Codepoints registry and