Scott,
please see inline (##PP3)
On 01/06/2020 12:46, Scott O. Bradner wrote:
inline
On Jun 1, 2020, at 5:54 AM, Peter Psenak wrote:
##PP2
It's the ambiguity that causes the problem. Here's a real life example which
triggered some of this work:
A network has RSVP-TE enabled on one s
inline
> On Jun 1, 2020, at 5:54 AM, Peter Psenak wrote:
>
>
> ##PP2
>
> It's the ambiguity that causes the problem. Here's a real life example which
> triggered some of this work:
>
> A network has RSVP-TE enabled on one subset of links, and SRTE on some other
> subset. On a link where R
Scott,
please see inline (##PP2)
On 30/05/2020 20:38, Scott O. Bradner wrote:
thanks for the reply - see in line
On May 28, 2020, at 10:09 AM, Peter Psenak
wrote:
Hi Scott,
please see inline (##PP):
On 27/05/2020 17:17, Scott Bradner via Datatracker wrote:
Reviewer: Scott Bradner
Revie
thanks for the reply - see in line
> On May 28, 2020, at 10:09 AM, Peter Psenak
> wrote:
>
> Hi Scott,
>
> please see inline (##PP):
>
> On 27/05/2020 17:17, Scott Bradner via Datatracker wrote:
>> Reviewer: Scott Bradner
>> Review result: Not Ready
>> This is an OPS-DIR review of OSPF Link
