...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Randy Bush
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2018 8:25 PM
To: Lizhenbin
Cc: lsr@ietf.org; GMO Crops ; ops...@ietf.org; rt...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] [GROW] [Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for
draft-gu-network-mornitoring-protol-00.txt
robin,
i am not ignoring you. i did
Robin,
Einar pointed exactly right points, very little to add.
Let’s keep is-is (narrow) scope.
1. There’s operational state of the protocol - I don’t really see what’s
missing in IETF/OpenConfig YANG models that would nessesarily require new
work?
Please be specific in your answers
2. What’s in
> On Jul 6, 2018, at 8:59 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> Why anyone would need BMP wrapper to monitor IGP ?
>
> probably similar reasons that folk seem to need bgp-ls to get the
> is-is/ospf databases. is-is and ospf have decades of complexity
> layered on un-simple bases. so we seek yet
> Why anyone would need BMP wrapper to monitor IGP ?
probably similar reasons that folk seem to need bgp-ls to get the
is-is/ospf databases. is-is and ospf have decades of complexity
layered on un-simple bases. so we seek yet another layer of gunk
through which to see them more 'simply.'
i
+1
On 6 Jul 2018, at 10:46, Robert Wilton
mailto:rwilton=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org>>
wrote:
On 05/07/2018 23:03, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
Hi Robin,
I know for a fact that there have been applications written that do passive
monitoring using IS-IS and simply advertising yourself in
Hi Randy,
Since BMP is promoted in GROW WG, the work has much similarity with BMP. So we
applied for the presentation here.
Best Regards,
Robin
-Original Message-
From: Randy Bush [mailto:ra...@psg.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2018 2:46 AM
To: Acee Lindem (acee)
Cc: Lizhenbin ;
i am confused as why this is in grow. it's protocol.
randy
___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
