...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Randy Bush
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2018 8:25 PM
Cc: email@example.com; GMO Crops ; ops...@ietf.org; rt...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] [GROW] [Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for
i am not ignoring you. i did
Einar pointed exactly right points, very little to add.
Let’s keep is-is (narrow) scope.
1. There’s operational state of the protocol - I don’t really see what’s
missing in IETF/OpenConfig YANG models that would nessesarily require new
Please be specific in your answers
2. What’s in
> On Jul 6, 2018, at 8:59 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> Why anyone would need BMP wrapper to monitor IGP ?
> probably similar reasons that folk seem to need bgp-ls to get the
> is-is/ospf databases. is-is and ospf have decades of complexity
> layered on un-simple bases. so we seek yet
> Why anyone would need BMP wrapper to monitor IGP ?
probably similar reasons that folk seem to need bgp-ls to get the
is-is/ospf databases. is-is and ospf have decades of complexity
layered on un-simple bases. so we seek yet another layer of gunk
through which to see them more 'simply.'
On 6 Jul 2018, at 10:46, Robert Wilton
On 05/07/2018 23:03, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
I know for a fact that there have been applications written that do passive
monitoring using IS-IS and simply advertising yourself in
Since BMP is promoted in GROW WG, the work has much similarity with BMP. So we
applied for the presentation here.
From: Randy Bush [mailto:ra...@psg.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2018 2:46 AM
To: Acee Lindem (acee)
Cc: Lizhenbin ;
i am confused as why this is in grow. it's protocol.
Lsr mailing list