...@foxmail.com>>; Les Ginsberg
> > (ginsberg)
> > mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com>>; jmh
> > mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com>>; TEAS WG
> > mailto:t...@ietf.org>>; lsr
> > mailto:lsr@ietf.org>>
> > Subject: Re: [Lsr] [Teas] Fwd: Work
l#name-scalabliity-design-principl states:
> > > “The routing protocols (IGP or BGP) do not need to be involved in any of
> > these points, and it is important to isolate them from these aspects in
> > order
> > that there is no impact on scaling or stability.”
> >
r draft-dong-lsr-sr-enhanced-vpn, I would oppose it.
> > This then puts draft-ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt in the position of publishing
> information about a solution which the IETF is discouraging. I do not know
> why the IETF would want to do this.
> > If, despite all of the above
lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] [Teas] Fwd: Working Group Last Call for "Applicability of IS-IS
Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Network Resource Partition (NRP)" -
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-06
(NOTE: I am replying to Joel’s post rather than the original last call email
> From: Lsr On Behalf Of Chongfeng Xie
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2024 7:41 PM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; jmh
> ; Acee Lindem ; TEAS WG
> ; lsr
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] [Teas] Fwd: Working Group Last Call for "Applicability of
> IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Se
To: Chongfeng Xie; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); jmh; Acee Lindem; TEAS WG; lsr
Subject: Re: [Lsr] [Teas] Fwd: Working Group Last Call for "Applicability of
IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Network Resource Partition
(NRP)" - draft-ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-06
From
gt;
> > If, despite all of the above, at some point it is judged not premature to
> > publish this draft, I think the draft should at least include statements
> > indicating that this approach is not a recommended deployment solution.
> >
> >Les
> >
>Les
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Lsr *On Behalf Of * Joel Halpern
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 10, 2024 3:22 PM
> *To:* Acee Lindem ; t...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] [Teas] Fwd: Working Group Last Call for
> "Applicability of IS-IS Multi-Topolog
, 2024 7:41 PM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; jmh
; Acee Lindem ; TEAS WG
; lsr
Subject: Re: [Lsr] [Teas] Fwd: Working Group Last Call for "Applicability of
IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Network Resource Partition
(NRP)" - draft-ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-06
Hi Le
.
Best regards,
Chongfeng
From: Les Ginsberg \(ginsberg\)
Date: 2024-01-11 08:21
To: Joel Halpern; Acee Lindem; t...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] [Teas] Fwd: Working Group Last Call for "Applicability of
IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Network Resource Part
: 2024-01-11 07:22
To: Acee Lindem; teas; lsr
Subject: Re: [Lsr] [Teas] Fwd: Working Group Last Call for "Applicability of
IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Network Resource Partition
(NRP)" - draft-ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-06
Given that the documents that provide
deployment solution.
Les
From: Lsr On Behalf Of Joel Halpern
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2024 3:22 PM
To: Acee Lindem ; t...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] [Teas] Fwd: Working Group Last Call for "Applicability of
IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Network Res
Given that the documents that provide the basic definitions needed for
this are still active Internet Drafts, it seems premature to last call
this document.
As a lesser matter, it seems odd that
draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices, which defines the terms needed to
understand this draft, is
13 matches
Mail list logo
