Hi Aijun,
On 25/07/18 01:53 , Aijun Wang wrote:
Hi, Ketan and Acee:
I am working on the other use cases of "Source Router ID" extension, which may
corresponding to that in RFC7794.
you want to use Extended Prefix LSA for advertising the "Source router
ID", not the Summary LSA.
thanks,
Pet
Hi, Rob:
If we use BGP-LS to get the underlay topology, we will not consider deployment
other methods such as IGP adjacency or LSDB telemetry, although all of them are
applicable.
If we deploy BGP-LS adjacency with routers in multi-area to get the full
multi-area topology, it will be no dif
Hi, Peter:
Actually, only the unnumbered scenario that you insisted has no straightforward
solution for the topology reconstruction. As I had explained previously,
unnumbered interface deployment is very seldom within our network, because it
is unavailable for remote testing and management.
If
Hi, Ketan and Acee:
I am working on the other use cases of "Source Router ID" extension, which may
corresponding to that in RFC7794. Once finished, I will update the draft.
RFC5392 and RFC5316 are for inter-AS TE extension, not inter-area scenario and
solution that proposed in this draft.
-
