Eric -
Thanx for your review.
Please see inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
> Sent: Monday, June 08, 2020 6:06 AM
> To: The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf-isis-te-...@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; Acee
> Lindem (acee) ; aretana.i...@gmail.com; Acee Lindem
> (acee)
> Subject: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-te-app-14: (with
> COMMENT)
>
> Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-isis-te-app-14: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-te-app/
>
>
>
> --
> COMMENT:
> --
>
> Thank you for the work put into this document. I have only one nits in section
> 4.3: while I appreciate IPv6, there is no need to capitalize 'IPv6 Interface
> Address' as "IPv4 interface address" is not capitalized ;-)
[Les:] You are correct in identifying this inconsistency - but note that the
draft follows what is in
https://www.iana.org/assignments/isis-tlv-codepoints/isis-tlv-codepoints.xhtml#isis-tlv-codepoints-22-23-25-141-222-223
.
😊
It seems this discrepancy involves RFCs 5305 and 6119 as well.
Les
>
> Special thanks to Acee, as the document shepherd he managed to represent
> the
> conflicts within the WG.
>
> I hope that this helps to improve the document,
>
> Regards,
>
> -éric
>
>
___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
