the intent
of this draft.
Thanx.
Les
From: Aijun Wang
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2020 7:20 PM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; 'Christian Hopps'
; lsr@ietf.org
Cc: lsr-...@ietf.org; 'Antoni Przygienda'
Subject: 答复: [Lsr] 答复: WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv
Hi, Les:
The questions
gt;; 'Antoni Przygienda'
主题: RE: [Lsr] 答复: WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv
Aijun -
Since advertising some sort of capability would also be unusable until all
routers were upgraded to understand the new capability advertisement this does
not help.
The consequences of ena
> -Original Message-
> From: Lsr On Behalf Of Aijun Wang
> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2020 6:31 PM
> To: 'Christian Hopps' ; lsr@ietf.org
> Cc: lsr-...@ietf.org; 'Antoni Przygienda'
> Subject: [Lsr] 答复: WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv
>
Is there any method to indicate or negotiate the support of
ISO10589/RFC5304/RFC6233 because they are not back compatible?
What will be the consequence when not all of the routers within the IGP
domain support the same RFC?
Will it valuable to add more clarification for the above incompatible
