>>> described in
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions/ .
>>>
>>> Les
>>>
>>> > -Original Message-----
>>> > From: Lsr On Behalf Of Gyan Mishra
>>> > Sent: Tuesday, May 14
>> > To: Mirja Kühlewind
>> > Cc: draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensi...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps
>> > ; uma.chund...@huawei.com;
>> > aretana.i...@gmail.com; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; The IESG ;
>> > lsr@ietf.org
>> > Subject: Re: [Lsr] Mirja Kühlewind&
t; > aretana.i...@gmail.com; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; The IESG ;
> > lsr@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [Lsr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on
> draft-ietf-isis-segment-
> > routing-extensions-24: (with COMMENT)
> >
> >
> > I noticed in the intro that IPv4 is not mentio
>> Cc: The IESG ; draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-
>> extensi...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps ;
>> uma.chund...@huawei.com; aretana.i...@gmail.com; lsr-cha...@ietf.org;
>> lsr@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-segment-
>
[Lsr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-segment-
> routing-extensions-24: (with COMMENT)
>
>
> With SR is PHP P flag really necessary as that was used in with mpls
> historically
> to offload the ultimate hop router from having to pop all labels within the
>
@gmail.com; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; The IESG ;
> lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-segment-
> routing-extensions-24: (with COMMENT)
>
>
> I noticed in the intro that IPv4 is not mentioned just IPv6 and mpls. Was
> tha
With SR is PHP P flag really necessary as that was used in with mpls
historically to offload the ultimate hop router from having to pop all labels
within the label stack but with high end routers these days the legacy PHP does
not provide any cpu processing gains and with LDP has resulted in is
I noticed in the intro that IPv4 is not mentioned just IPv6 and mpls. Was that
on purpose.
Segment Routing (SR) allows for a flexible definition of end-to-end
paths within IGP topologies by encoding paths as sequences of
topological sub-paths, called "segments". These segments are
Mirja -
Inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mirja Kuehlewind
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 9:35 AM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> Cc: The IESG ; draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-
> extensi...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps ; Uma Chunduri
> ; aretana.i...@gmail.com; lsr-cha...@ietf.org;
> ls
Hi Les,
Please see inline.
> On 14. May 2019, at 18:12, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote:
>
> Mirja -
>
> Thanx for the review.
> Responses inline.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 4:58 AM
>> To: The IESG
>> Cc: draft-ietf-
Mirja -
Thanx for the review.
Responses inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 4:58 AM
> To: The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensi...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps
> ; Uma Chunduri ;
> aretana.i...@gmail.com; lsr-c
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-24: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
12 matches
Mail list logo
