Hi Alvaro,
please see inline (##PP)
On 14/05/2020 19:26, Alvaro Retana wrote:
On May 5, 2020 at 6:08:27 AM, Peter Psenak wrote:
Peter:
Hi!
...
I tried to address all of them, some have been resolved during ISIS
draft review, in which case I took the same resolution for this draf.
Please
On May 5, 2020 at 6:08:27 AM, Peter Psenak wrote:
Peter:
Hi!
...
> I tried to address all of them, some have been resolved during ISIS
> draft review, in which case I took the same resolution for this draf.
>
> Please see inline, look for ##PP
There's only one outstanding comment that I don'
Hi Alvaro,
the new version which addresses your comments have been posted.
thanks,
Peter
On 05/05/2020 12:08, Peter Psenak wrote:
Hi Alvaro,
thanks for your comments.
I apologize for the delay in responding to your comments.
I tried to address all of them, some have been resolved during IS
Hi Alvaro,
thanks for your comments.
I apologize for the delay in responding to your comments.
I tried to address all of them, some have been resolved during ISIS
draft review, in which case I took the same resolution for this draf.
Please see inline, look for ##PP
Dear Authors:
Happy New
Dear Authors:
Happy New Year!
I have finished reading this document, reviewing the e-mail archive
and all the various reviews and comments. Quoting one of the authors,
"it is essential that the two IGPs provide equivalent functionality"
[1] -- so I have considered draft-ietf-isis-te-app-09 in p
