>> Hi Gyan,
>>
>> See brief inlines.
>>
>> From: Gyan Mishra
>> Date: Thursday, July 29, 2021 at 10:24 PM
>> To: Acee Lindem
>> Cc: "draft-wang-lsr-passive-interface-attrib...@ietf.org"
>> , "lsr@ietf.org"
>>
>>
To: Acee Lindem
> Cc: "draft-wang-lsr-passive-interface-attrib...@ietf.org"
> , "lsr@ietf.org"
>
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Comments on "Passive Interface Attribute" -
> draft-wang-lsr-passive-interface-attribute
>
>
> Hi Acee
>
> In-
Hi Acee
In-line
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 4:24 PM Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> Speaking as WG member:
>
>
>
> Authors,
>
>
>
> I think this draft is still flawed. Regarding the terminology, I don’t
> think it should refer to passive interfaces at all since they aren’t
> referenced in protocol
Speaking as WG member:
Authors,
I think this draft is still flawed. Regarding the terminology, I don’t think it
should refer to passive interfaces at all since they aren’t referenced in
protocol documents. Rather, you should use stub-link consistently – including
the title. However, I don’t
