Thanks for your review, comments and suggestions. We’ve incorporated them and
posted an update for this draft.
Note that as requested in a separate email thread, the draft has been renamed
so it is associated with the LSR WG instead of the old OSPF one :
This draft also has editorial changes to align with the latest version of the
draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming and is functionally equivalent to
The authors believe this version is ready for WG adoption as requested
Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)
Sent: 16 December 2019 20:31
To: Acee Lindem (acee) ;
Subject: RE: Comments on draft-li-ospf-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-07.txt
Thanks very much for your help to refine the draft. You suggestion also makes
sense. We will update accordingly.
From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 5:44 AM
Subject: Comments on draft-li-ospf-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-07.txt
Hi Robin, et al,
One thing I’d like to see is incorporation of the text for the MSD types in the
draft. It is less than one and a half pages and it doesn’t make sense to
reference the IS-IS draft. I’ve also attached my editorial comments.
Lsr mailing list