Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery" (Corrected)

I am unaware of any IPR, apart from the one disclosed [1]. Regards, Dhruv BTW the WG adopted I-D [2] is already posted, but I wanted to make sure that my response is archived on the list. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3351/ [2]

Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery" (Corrected)

Hi Acee, all. No, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. BR, Dan. 发件人: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] 发送时间: 2018年11月16日 11:59 收件人: draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support 抄送: lsr@ietf.org ; p...@ietf.org

Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery" (Corrected)

Hi Qin, This looks more like applying a mechanism analogous to BGP capabilities negotiation to PCC<->PCE. However, please check and file the necessary IPR disclosure if applicable. Thanks, Acee From: Qin Wu Date: Friday, November 16, 2018 at 2:44 AM To: Acee Lindem ,

Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery" (Corrected)

It seems there was one relevant IPR https://patents.google.com/patent/US8127129B2/en but I am not sure it is applicable. I will consult with our IPR people to check on this. -Qin 发件人: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] 发送时间: 2018年11月16日 11:59 收件人:

Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery" (Corrected)

Authors – Reminder that you need to explicitly reply to this poll. From: Lsr on behalf of Acee Lindem Date: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 at 3:02 PM To: draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support Cc: "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IGP extension for PCEP security capability

[Lsr] IPR Poll for "IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery" (Corrected)

Authors, Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). There are currently no IPR disclosures against