-domain-met...@ietf.org
Cc: lsr
Subject: RE: [Lsr] Intra-domain SAVNET method -
draft-lin-savnet-lsr-intra-domain-method-03
+1
The problem can be solved - and in a much more robust way than what is proposed
in the draft - without any protocol extensions.
There is no reason for this draft
t; To: draft-lin-savnet-lsr-intra-domain-met...@ietf.org
> Cc: lsr
> Subject: [Lsr] Intra-domain SAVNET method - draft-lin-savnet-lsr-intra-
> domain-method-03
>
> Speaking as WG member:
>
> Co-Authors,
>
> I see you have a slot at the LSR meeting on Thursday to pres
Speaking as WG member:
Co-Authors,
I see you have a slot at the LSR meeting on Thursday to present the subject
draft.
I believe this document is misguided. You shouldn't need to advertise protected
prefixes. If you are doing Source Address Validation for intra-domain sources,
why wouldn't
