call for
draft-acee-lsr-isis-yang-augmentation-v1-03]
Hi Folks, so far we've received only a single feedback on adopting this
document, can we get a few more responses form the WG?
Thanks,
Chris.
> On Jan 5, 2021, at 4:19 AM, Christian Hopps wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
> This begins
021 9:13 PM
> To: lsr@ietf.org
> Cc: Christian Hopps ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org
> Subject: [Lsr] More responses required [Re: WG adoption call for
> draft-acee-lsr-isis-yang-augmentation-v1-03]
>
> Hi Folks, so far we've received only a single feedback on adopting this
> document, can
Hi Chris and all,
I support the adoption.
Best,
Yali
-Original Message-
From: Christian Hopps [mailto:cho...@chopps.org]
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2021 9:13 PM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Cc: Christian Hopps ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] More responses required [Re: WG adoption call
Hi Chris,
I support adoption.
But I found the use of "version 1" in the title a bit weird. Every
time we add new features, we would have to name the I-Ds as version
2,3..; IMHO it would be distracting. Should we just name the features
instead, something like - "IS-IS YANG Model Augmentations for
s
时 间：2021-01-22 21:13:22
主 题：[Lsr] More responses required [Re: WG adoption call for
draft-acee-lsr-isis-yang-augmentation-v1-03]
Hi Folks, so far we've received only a single feedback on adopting this
document, can we get a few more responses form the WG?
Thanks,
Chris.
> On Jan 5, 2021, a
Hi Folks, so far we've received only a single feedback on adopting this
document, can we get a few more responses form the WG?
Thanks,
Chris.
> On Jan 5, 2021, at 4:19 AM, Christian Hopps wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
> This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for the following draft:
>
>
