Hi all, Following many interesting discussions on the mailing list, during IETF meetings 105 & 106 and of-list, please find below an updated version.
Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-decraene-lsr-isis-flooding-speed Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-decraene-lsr-isis-flooding-speed-03 Main changes are: Flooding Parameters TLV: name changed, advertised in both Hello and SNP rather than just Hello, contains sub-TLVs, parameters encoded in 4 octets. Terminology: upstream/downstream terms removed, in favor of terms from ISO specification (transmitter, receiver); burst-size rename to receive-window. Significant editorials changes. New section on the faster acknowledgment of LSPs. New section on the faster retransmission of lost LSPs. Comments are welcomed. Thank you, Regards, --Bruno on behalf of all co-authors -----Original Message----- From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] Sent: Monday, March 9, 2020 3:11 PM To: Jayesh J; Tony Li; Chris Bowers; Gunter Van de Velde; DECRAENE Bruno TGI/OLN Subject: New Version Notification for draft-decraene-lsr-isis-flooding-speed-03.txt A new version of I-D, draft-decraene-lsr-isis-flooding-speed-03.txt has been successfully submitted by Bruno Decraene and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-decraene-lsr-isis-flooding-speed Revision: 03 Title: IS-IS Flooding Parameters advertisement Document date: 2020-03-09 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 13 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-decraene-lsr-isis-flooding-speed-03.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-decraene-lsr-isis-flooding-speed/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-decraene-lsr-isis-flooding-speed-03 Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-decraene-lsr-isis-flooding-speed Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-decraene-lsr-isis-flooding-speed-03 Abstract: This document proposes a mechanism that can be used to increase the speed at which link state information is exchanged between two routers when multiple LSPs need to be flooded, such as in case of a node failure. It also reduces the likelihood of overloading the router receiving the LSPs. This document defines a new TLV to be advertised in SNP and or Hello messages. This TLV may carry a set of parameters indicating the performance capacity to receive LSPs: the number of LSPs which can the received back to back, the minimum delay between further two consecutive LSPs and the minimum delay before retransmission of an LSP. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
