Kuehlewind (IETF)
> >> Sent: Thursday, February 29, 2024 3:30 PM
> >> To: DECRAENE Bruno INNOV/NET
> >> Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ;
> >> gsoli...@protonmail.com;
> >> draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding....@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org;
> >> tsv-...
> From: Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
>> Sent: Thursday, February 29, 2024 3:30 PM
>> To: DECRAENE Bruno INNOV/NET
>> Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ;
>> gsoli...@protonmail.com; draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding@ietf.org;
>> lsr@ietf.org; tsv-...@ietf.org
>> S
il.com; draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding@ietf.org;
> lsr@ietf.org; tsv-...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-06
>
> Hi Bruno,
>
> Sorry for my late reply.
>
> Please see some more comments below.
>
> >
Hi Bruno,
Thanks for your replies.
On the high-level I think that some or most of the explanation you provide me
below about parameter values, should actually go into the draft. I understand
that there is not a one fits all but that’s why min/max values are often more
important than
In regards to "operation on a LAN interface",
>
> > Section 6.2.1.2:
> > “f no PSNPs have been generated on the LAN for a suitable period of time,
> then an LSP transmitter can safely set the number of un-acknowledged LSPs to
> zero.
> > Since this suitable period of time is much higher
Mirja -
In regards to Section 6.3...
>
> Sec 6.3
> This section is entirely not clear to me. There is no algorithm described and
> I
> would not know how to implement this.
[LES:] This is intentional.
As this approach is NOT dependent on any signaling from the receiver, the
transmitter is
[+Les, Guillaume as we go quite deep in the discussion]
Hi Mirja,
Thank you for your review and comments. Very useful.
Please see inline [Bruno]
> From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker
> Sent: Friday, February 2, 2024 3:57 PM
>
> Reviewer: Mirja Kühlewind
> Review result: Not Ready
>
>
Reviewer: Mirja Kühlewind
Review result: Not Ready
First of all I have a clarification question: The use the of flags TLV with the
O flag is not clear to me. Is that also meant as a configuration parameter or
is that supposed to be a subTLV that has to be sent together with the PSNP? If
it is a
