Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "ISIS Extensions in Support of Inter-AS MPLS and GMPLS TE" - draft-chen-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-02

2020-11-07 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
The WG adoption call has ended and draft-chen-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-02 has been accepted as a WG document. While we didn’t get as much response as I would have liked, every response was supportive of adopting this protocol maintenance draft as a WG document. When the draft submission window

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "ISIS Extensions in Support of Inter-AS MPLS and GMPLS TE" - draft-chen-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-02

2020-10-29 Thread Yingzhen Qu
I support the adoption of this draft. It’s a simple and useful extension. Thanks, Yingzhen From: Lsr Date: Sunday, October 25, 2020 at 7:03 PM To: Acee Lindem (acee) , lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "ISIS Extensions in Support of Inter-AS MPLS and GMPLS TE" -

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "ISIS Extensions in Support of Inter-AS MPLS and GMPLS TE" - draft-chen-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-02

2020-10-25 Thread Mach Chen
As one of co-authors of the draft, I support the adoption. Best regards, Mach From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Friday, October 23, 2020 10:43 PM To: lsr@ietf.org Subject: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "ISIS Extensions in Support of Inter-AS MPLS and

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "ISIS Extensions in Support of Inter-AS MPLS and GMPLS TE" - draft-chen-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-02

2020-10-24 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Speaking as a WG member: I support WG adoption of this draft. Thanks, Acee From: Lsr on behalf of "Acee Lindem (acee)" Date: Friday, October 23, 2020 at 10:43 AM To: "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "ISIS Extensions in Support of Inter-AS MPLS and GMPLS TE" -

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "ISIS Extensions in Support of Inter-AS MPLS and GMPLS TE" - draft-chen-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-02

2020-10-24 Thread Gyan Mishra
I support WG Adoption. Thanks Gyan On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 1:19 PM stefano previdi wrote: > Hi, > > as co-author, I support the adoption of draft-chen-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-02. > > Thanks. > s. > > > > On Oct 23, 2020, at 4:42 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) 40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > > >

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "ISIS Extensions in Support of Inter-AS MPLS and GMPLS TE" - draft-chen-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-02

2020-10-24 Thread stefano previdi
Hi, as co-author, I support the adoption of draft-chen-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-02. Thanks. s. > On Oct 23, 2020, at 4:42 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) > wrote: > > This is simple BIS update to RFC 5316 is required to support IS-IS Inter-AS > TE in IPv6 only networks. The authors have asked for WG

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "ISIS Extensions in Support of Inter-AS MPLS and GMPLS TE" - draft-chen-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-02

2020-10-23 Thread Jeff Tantsura
Yes/support Regards, Jeff > On Oct 23, 2020, at 07:43, Acee Lindem (acee) > wrote: > >  > This is simple BIS update to RFC 5316 is required to support IS-IS Inter-AS > TE in IPv6 only networks. The authors have asked for WG adoption. > > This begins a two week LSR Working Group Adoption

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "ISIS Extensions in Support of Inter-AS MPLS and GMPLS TE" - draft-chen-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-02

2020-10-23 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
This simple extension to RFC 5316 is analogous to the extension to RFC 4971 defined in RFC 7981. As Acee indicated, this is needed to support operation in IPv6 only networks. I support WG adoption as a co-author. I would appreciate WG support so we can complete this necessary extension. Les

[Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "ISIS Extensions in Support of Inter-AS MPLS and GMPLS TE" - draft-chen-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-02

2020-10-23 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
This is simple BIS update to RFC 5316 is required to support IS-IS Inter-AS TE in IPv6 only networks. The authors have asked for WG adoption. This begins a two week LSR Working Group Adoption Poll for “ISIS Extensions in Support of Inter-Autonomous System (AS) MPLS and GMPLS Traffic