Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-02-14 Thread Chris Bowers
All, I'm forwarding this question and subsequent response to the list because it looks like I accidentally sent it only to Peter before. Chris On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 3:25 AM Peter Psenak wrote: > Hi Chris, > > On 07/02/2020 23:15, Chris Bowers wrote: > > Peter, > > > > Thanks for the

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-02-14 Thread Chris Bowers
All, I'm forwarding this question and subsequent response to the list because it looks like I accidentally sent it only to Peter before. Chris On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 4:15 PM Chris Bowers wrote: > Peter, > > Thanks for the clarification. > > Can you also clarify how a receiver should interpret

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-02-11 Thread Ahmed Bashandy
As a co-author I support this draft and I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this draft Ahmed On 1/21/20 4:14 PM, Christian Hopps wrote: This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Feb 4, 2020, for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-02-05 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Chris, On 04/02/2020 23:17, Chris Bowers wrote: Peter, Suppose I receive a locator advertisement from router R7 with locator = ::/64 and End-SID ::1.  I would like to be able to use End-SID ::1 as a Node-SID when constructing traffic engineered paths.  That is, I want to know

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-02-04 Thread Chris Bowers
Peter, Suppose I receive a locator advertisement from router R7 with locator = ::/64 and End-SID ::1. I would like to be able to use End-SID ::1 as a Node-SID when constructing traffic engineered paths. That is, I want to know that the person or system that configured R7 believes

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-02-04 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Chris, On 03/02/2020 14:39, Peter Psenak wrote: I think a reasonable solution would be to remove the restriction on the N-flag to allow it to be used for non-/128 prefixes/locators.  This would allow the three possible prefix-SIDs states to be easily represented. ##PP right, that could be

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-02-03 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
) > Subject: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions > > This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Feb 4, 2020, for > draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions/ > > Authors please ind

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-02-03 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Chris, adding to what Les has said. Please see inline (##PP) On 31/01/2020 21:10, Chris Bowers wrote: Peter and Les, It seems to me that for the Node Flag in RFC7794 and the proposed Anycast Flag in draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-04, we are ultimately concerned with how to

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-02-02 Thread Satoru Matsushima
I support the WGLC to move this doc forward. And as a contributor, I’m not aware of any IPR that has not been disclosed. cheers, --satoru > On 1/21/20 4:14 PM, Christian Hopps wrote: > This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Feb 4, 2020, for > draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions > >

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-02-02 Thread Ahmed Bashandy
I am not aware of any IPR that has not been disclosed Ahmed On 1/21/20 4:14 PM, Christian Hopps wrote: This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Feb 4, 2020, for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions/ Authors

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-31 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Lindem (acee) Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions Peter and Les, It seems to me that for the Node Flag in RFC7794 and the proposed Anycast Flag in draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-04, we are ultimately concerned with how to identify IGP-Node Segments and IGP-A

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-31 Thread Chris Bowers
Peter and Les, It seems to me that for the Node Flag in RFC7794 and the proposed Anycast Flag in draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-04, we are ultimately concerned with how to identify IGP-Node Segments and IGP-Anycast Segments, as defined in RFC8402, the Segment Routing Architecture

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-30 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Chris, please see inline (##PP) On 29/01/2020 17:25, Chris Bowers wrote: I would like to proposed the following text to make section 6 more clear. Thanks, Chris  (existing text) 6.  Advertising Anycast Property    Both prefixes and SRv6 Locators may be

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-29 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Hopps ; Acee Lindem (acee) Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions I would like to proposed the following text to make section 6 more clear. Thanks, Chris (existing text) 6. Advertising Anycast Property Both prefixes and SRv6 Locators may

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-29 Thread Chris Bowers
I would like to proposed the following text to make section 6 more clear. Thanks, Chris (existing text) 6. Advertising Anycast Property Both prefixes and SRv6 Locators may be configured as anycast and as such the same value can be advertised by multiple

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-28 Thread bruno.decraene
or another error condition) > > I would go for (b) and ignore the parent sub-TLV. > Will update accordingly. Thank you Peter. --Bruno > thanks, > Peter > > > > > > > Thank you > > --Bruno > > > >> -----Original Message- > >>

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-28 Thread Peter Psenak
bination of SIDs --- OLD: is received in both in a NEW: is received in both a -- OLD: the this draft NEW: this draft ##PP fixed all of the above. thanks, Peter -Original Message- From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian Hopps Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2020 1

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-28 Thread bruno.decraene
> From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 1:43 PM > To: DECRAENE Bruno TGI/OLN; lsr@ietf.org > Cc: lsr-...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps; Acee Lindem (acee) > Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions > > Hi Bru

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-27 Thread Peter Psenak
a combination of SID's NEW: a combination of SIDs --- OLD: is received in both in a NEW: is received in both a -- OLD: the this draft NEW: this draft ##PP fixed all of the above. thanks, Peter -Original Message- From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian H

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-27 Thread Zhuangshunwan
Support. Thanks, Shunwan From:Christian Hopps mailto:cho...@chopps.org>> To:lsr mailto:lsr@ietf.org>> Cc:lsr-ads mailto:lsr-...@ietf.org>>;Christian Hopps mailto:cho...@chopps.org>>;Acee Lindem (acee) mailto:a...@cisco.com>> Date:2020-01-22 08:15:24 Subject:[Ls

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-26 Thread Lizhenbin
...@huawei.com<mailto:lizhen...@huawei.com> 发件人:Christian Hopps 收件人:lsr 抄 送:lsr-ads ;Christian Hopps ;Acee Lindem (acee) 时 间:2020-01-22 08:15:23 主 题:[Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Feb 4, 2020, for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-exte

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-24 Thread Yingzhen Qu
Support. Thanks, Yingzhen From: Lsr on behalf of "Xiejingrong (Jingrong)" Date: Friday, January 24, 2020 at 7:14 AM To: Christian Hopps , lsr Cc: lsr-ads , Christian Hopps , "Acee Lindem (acee)" Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions Res

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-24 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
2020 9:19 AM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org Cc: lsr-...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps ; Acee Lindem (acee) Subject: RE: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions Les, From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com] Sent: Friday, January 24, 2020 5:39 PM To: DECRAEN

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-24 Thread bruno.decraene
Les, From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com] Sent: Friday, January 24, 2020 5:39 PM To: DECRAENE Bruno TGI/OLN; lsr@ietf.org Cc: lsr-...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps; Acee Lindem (acee) Subject: RE: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions Bruno - Regarding §8.2

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-24 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
I support progressing this draft. Les > -Original Message- > From: Lsr On Behalf Of Christian Hopps > Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 4:15 PM > To: lsr@ietf.org > Cc: lsr-...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps ; Acee Lindem > (acee) > Subject: [Lsr] WG Last Call dra

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-24 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
s --- OLD: is received in both in a NEW: is received in both a -- OLD: the this draft NEW: this draft -Original Message- From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian Hopps Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2020 1:15 AM To: lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org> Cc: lsr-

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-24 Thread bruno.decraene
header is " draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions". Probably a better name could be found for the RFC. E.g. IS-IS extensions for SRv6. --- Proposed OLD: a combination of SID's NEW: a combination of SIDs --- OLD: is received in both in a NEW: is received in both a -- OLD: the

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-24 Thread Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
support. From:Christian Hopps To:lsr Cc:lsr-ads ;Christian Hopps ;Acee Lindem (acee) Date:2020-01-22 08:15:24 Subject:[Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Feb 4, 2020, for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions https

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-24 Thread Huaimo Chen
Support. Best Regards, Huaimo > On Jan 22, 2020, at 1:14 AM, Christian Hopps wrote: > > This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Feb 4, 2020, for > draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions > > >

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-24 Thread stefano previdi
As contributor, I do support the draft and I’m not aware of any undisclosed IPR. Thanks. s. > On Jan 22, 2020, at 1:14 AM, Christian Hopps wrote: > > This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Feb 4, 2020, for > draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions > >

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-24 Thread Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil)
gt; Subject: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions > > This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Feb 4, 2020, for > draft-ietf-lsr- > isis-srv6-extensions > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions/ > > Authors please

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-23 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions Support. Not aware of any undisclosed IPR. Paul On Tue, 2020-01-21 at 19:14 -0500, Christian Hopps wrote: > This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Feb 4, 2020, for > draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions >

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-23 Thread Huzhibo
:15:23 主 题:[Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Feb 4, 2020, for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions/ Authors please indicate if you aware of any other IPR

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-23 Thread Paul Wells (pauwells)
Support. Not aware of any undisclosed IPR. Paul On Tue, 2020-01-21 at 19:14 -0500, Christian Hopps wrote: > This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Feb 4, 2020, for > draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions/ > >

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-23 Thread Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
Support progressing this document. On 1/21/20, 4:17 PM, "Lsr on behalf of Christian Hopps" wrote: This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Feb 4, 2020, for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions/

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-23 Thread Zafar Ali (zali)
t; , Christian Hopps , "Acee Lindem (acee)" Subject: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Feb 4, 2020, for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions/

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-22 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Speaking as WG member, I have reviewed revisions of this draft and support publication. Thanks, Acee On 1/21/20, 7:15 PM, "Christian Hopps" wrote: This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Feb 4, 2020, for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-22 Thread bruno.decraene
Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Feb 4, 2020, for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions/ Authors please indicate if you aware of any other IPR beyond what is posted

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-22 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Chris, On 22/01/2020 01:14, Christian Hopps wrote: This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Feb 4, 2020, for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions/ Authors please indicate if you aware of any other IPR beyond

[Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-21 Thread Christian Hopps
This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Feb 4, 2020, for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions/ Authors please indicate if you aware of any other IPR beyond what is posted: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3796/