Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

2019-02-28 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
. Thanks, Acee From: Lsr on behalf of Acee Lindem Date: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 at 8:25 AM To: "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01 This begins a tw

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

2019-02-21 Thread Aijun Wang
;> >> I say again, this draft in its current form is not ready to be adopted. >> >> >> >>Les >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Aijun Wang >> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 3:27 PM >> To: John E Drake >> Cc:

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

2019-02-21 Thread Aijun Wang
be adopted. > >Les > > > From: Aijun Wang > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 3:27 PM > To: John E Drake > Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Acee Lindem (acee) > ; lsr@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Pr

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

2019-02-21 Thread Tony Przygienda
> *To:* John E Drake > *Cc:* Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Acee Lindem (acee) < > a...@cisco.com>; lsr@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for > Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01 > > > &g

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

2019-02-21 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Drake Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Acee Lindem (acee) ; lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01 Hi, John: Thanks for your review and comments. The use cases and origin

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

2019-02-21 Thread Aijun Wang
Of Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2019 8:22 AM > To: Acee Lindem (acee) ; lsr@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix > Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01 > > To the

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

2019-02-21 Thread John E Drake
Lindem (acee) ; lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01 To the extent that the draft defines functionality equivalent to that defined in IS-IS RFC 7794 – specifically a means to

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

2019-02-18 Thread Lizhenbin
Yes/support. Best Regards, Zhenbin (Robin) From: Lsr mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 5:26 AM To: lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org> Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Or

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

2019-02-18 Thread Zhuangshunwan
Support. Thanks, Shunwan From: Lsr mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 5:26 AM To: lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org> Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draf

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

2019-02-18 Thread Naiming Shen (naiming)
I support. - Naiming From: Lsr mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 20:26 To: lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org> Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draf

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

2019-02-18 Thread Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
I think we are in sync, i.e. without this draft there is no use-case for node T1 to send an AS-scoped router info LSA without being ASBR. Please correct if you know of an existing use-case. Thx, Dirk On 2/18/2019 15:01, Peter Psenak wrote: Hi Dirk, On 18/02/2019 14:47 , Goethals, Dirk (Nokia -

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

2019-02-18 Thread Peter Psenak
On 18/02/2019 14:37 , Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) wrote: I agree with Peter. For this to work, the ABR would need to add ALL originators, while I had the impression that we only had 1 originator per prefix, i.e. the originator which was found to be the closed to the ABR and for which the

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

2019-02-18 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Dirk, On 18/02/2019 14:47 , Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) wrote: Hi Peter, and you use these when you send a traffic to some of the prefixes that T1 originates If T1 is not ASBR, and this draft is not implemented, how are the nodes in the other area's going to know that the

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

2019-02-18 Thread Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
Hi Peter, and you use these when you send a traffic to some of the prefixes that T1 originates If T1 is not ASBR, and this draft is not implemented, how are the nodes in the other area's going to know that the prefixes belong to T1? Dirk On 2/18/2019 14:34, Peter Psenak wrote: Hi Dirk, On

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

2019-02-18 Thread Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
I agree with Peter. For this to work, the ABR would need to add ALL originators, while I had the impression that we only had 1 originator per prefix, i.e. the originator which was found to be the closed to the ABR and for which the ABR installed a route. Dirk On 2/18/2019 14:15, Peter Psenak

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

2019-02-18 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Dirk, On 18/02/2019 14:27 , Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) wrote: Hi Peter, See inline DG>. Dirk On 2/18/2019 14:18, Peter Psenak wrote: Hi Dirk, On 18/02/2019 09:31 , Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) wrote: support +1 1 question: When S1 in another area receives such LSA, it

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

2019-02-18 Thread Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
Hi Peter, See inline DG>. Dirk On 2/18/2019 14:18, Peter Psenak wrote: Hi Dirk, On 18/02/2019 09:31 , Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) wrote: support +1 1 question: When S1 in another area receives such LSA, it then can learn that prefix Lt1 is associated with node T1, check the ELC,

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

2019-02-18 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
;OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01 This begins a two week adoption poll for the subject draft. Please send your comments to this list before 12:00 AM UTC on Thursday, February 28th, 2019. All authors have responded to the IPR poll and th

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

2019-02-18 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Dirk, On 18/02/2019 09:31 , Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) wrote: support +1 1 question: When S1 in another area receives such LSA, it then can learn that prefix Lt1 is associated with node T1, check the ELC, ERLD, or MSD value according to its necessity, and construct the

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

2019-02-18 Thread Peter Psenak
Support as coauthor, although I never really agreed with the usage of the prefix originator for topology construction as described in section 3 and 5. I would prefer that part to be removed. thanks, Peter On 13/02/2019 14:25 , Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: This begins a two week adoption poll

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

2019-02-18 Thread Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
+1 for support. Seems as a useful extension to have available in OSPF toolbox. G/ From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 20:26 To: lsr@ietf.org Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wan

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

2019-02-18 Thread Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
support +1 1 question: When S1 in another area receives such LSA, it then can learn that prefix Lt1 is associated with node T1, check the ELC, ERLD, or MSD value according to its necessity, and construct the right label stack at the ingress node S1 for the traffic destined to Lt1. How

[Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

2019-02-13 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
This begins a two week adoption poll for the subject draft. Please send your comments to this list before 12:00 AM UTC on Thursday, February 28th, 2019. All authors have responded to the IPR poll and there is one