Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "YANG Module for IS-IS Reverse Metric" - draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-01

2020-12-10 Thread tom petch
From: Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: 10 December 2020 00:11 Speaking as WG member: Hi Chris, Tom, On 12/9/20, 6:03 AM, "Lsr on behalf of tom petch" wrote: From: Lsr on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: 30 November 2020 18:14 Two thoughts isis-rmetric is a bit long as a prefix

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "YANG Module for IS-IS Reverse Metric" - draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-01

2020-12-09 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Speaking as WG member: Hi Chris, Tom, On 12/9/20, 6:03 AM, "Lsr on behalf of tom petch" wrote: From: Lsr on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: 30 November 2020 18:14 Two thoughts isis-rmetric is a bit long as a prefix - I note that the examples use rm which is a bit shor

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "YANG Module for IS-IS Reverse Metric" - draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-01

2020-12-09 Thread tom petch
From: Lsr on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: 30 November 2020 18:14 Two thoughts isis-rmetric is a bit long as a prefix - I note that the examples use rm which is a bit short. Perhaps isis-rm te-metric contains the value if the sub-tlv is present. What if it is not present? Is there a

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "YANG Module for IS-IS Reverse Metric" - draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-01

2020-12-01 Thread Yingzhen Qu
on behalf of "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" Date: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 at 3:46 PM To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" , "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "YANG Module for IS-IS Reverse Metric" - draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metr

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "YANG Module for IS-IS Reverse Metric" - draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-01

2020-12-01 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
I have reviewed the draft and support progressing this document. Les From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Monday, November 30, 2020 10:15 AM To: lsr@ietf.org Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "YANG Module for IS-IS Reverse Metric" - draft-ietf-lsr-yang-is

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "YANG Module for IS-IS Reverse Metric" - draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-01

2020-12-01 Thread Jeff Tantsura
yes/support Cheers, Jeff On Nov 30, 2020, 10:15 AM -0800, Acee Lindem (acee) , wrote: > As stated as the IETF 109 LSR WG meeting, we feel the IS-IS reverse metric > augmentation is ready for publication. This begins a two week last call for > the subject draft. Please indicate your support or o

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "YANG Module for IS-IS Reverse Metric" - draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-01

2020-12-01 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Speaking as a WG member, I support publication of the draft. Thanks, Acee From: Lsr on behalf of "Acee Lindem (acee)" Date: Monday, November 30, 2020 at 1:15 PM To: "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "YANG Module for IS-IS Reverse Metric&qu

[Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "YANG Module for IS-IS Reverse Metric" - draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-01

2020-11-30 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Authors, Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-01? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this

[Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "YANG Module for IS-IS Reverse Metric" - draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-01

2020-11-30 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
As stated as the IETF 109 LSR WG meeting, we feel the IS-IS reverse metric augmentation is ready for publication. This begins a two week last call for the subject draft. Please indicate your support or objection on this list prior to 12:00 AM UTC on December 15th, 2020. Also, review comments are