hat this is not the case
and we need not debate this further.
Les
From: Lsr mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of
Huaimo Chen
Sent: Sunday, November 5, 2023 11:34 AM
To: lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: [Lsr] draft-chen-lsr-isis-big-tlv
Hi Les,
In last IETF,
, 2023 11:34 AM
To: lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: [Lsr] draft-chen-lsr-isis-big-tlv
Hi Les,
In last IETF, you presented/stated that Backwards compatibility is not
possible. This seems not true. The solution proposed in
draft-chen-lsr-isis-big-tlv is backwards compatible
n claim that it is
"backwards-compatible". Hopefully you now understand that this is not the case
and we need not debate this further.
Les
From: Lsr On Behalf Of Huaimo Chen
Sent: Sunday, November 5, 2023 11:34 AM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] draft-chen-lsr-isis-big-tlv
Hi
Hi Les,
In last IETF, you presented/stated that Backwards compatibility is not
possible. This seems not true. The solution proposed in
draft-chen-lsr-isis-big-tlv is backwards compatible. Can you give your
definition of backwards compatibility?
In this IETF and last IETF, the slides states
