Subject: [Lsr] draft-zhu-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-flexalgo
Dear authors,
here are couple of comments to draft-zhu-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-flexalgo:
1. whether we want to flood VTN specific link data in IGPs or not is something
that deserves its own discussion.
IGP as one option can be used to distribute the VTN
Hi Peter,
Thanks for your comments. Please see some replies inline:
> -Original Message-
> From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Peter Psenak
> Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 5:46 PM
> To: lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: [Lsr] draft-zhu-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-flexalgo
&g
Dear authors,
here are couple of comments to draft-zhu-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-flexalgo:
1. whether we want to flood VTN specific link data in IGPs or not is
something that deserves its own discussion.
2. Nevertheless, the proposed encoding does not seem to be a fortunate one:
a) it hijacks the L2
Hi Authors,
I have the following comments/questions on the draft.
In section 2 "Advertisement of SR VTN Topology Attribute",
for the last sentence "..., the Flex-Algo identifier could be reused
as the identifier of the VTN in control plane.",
How do you reuse the Flex-Algo
