Hi Uma,
please see inline:
On 17/04/18 00:14 , Uma Chunduri wrote:
Dear All,
I am neutral to combining the content of OSPF and IS-IS into a single
draft.
However, I have 2 questions on this draft.
1.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
Hi Uma,
please see inline:
On 17/04/18 00:20 , Uma Chunduri wrote:
Hi Peter,
I have the feeling that the dependency of the "flooding topology" on the
flooded data is going to bring more complexity, than the selection of the distributed
algorithm to be used, if we ever need to support more t
This begins a two-week adoption poll for the following Flex Algorithm drafts:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hegdeppsenak-isis-sr-flex-algo/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ppsenak-ospf-sr-flex-algo/
The adoption poll will end at 12:00 AM EST on May 2nd, 2018. Please indicate
your
Support as coauthor on both drafts.
thanks,
Peter
On 17/04/18 16:44 , Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
This begins a two-week adoption poll for the following Flex Algorithm
drafts:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hegdeppsenak-isis-sr-flex-algo/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ppsenak-o
Support.
I am open to combining into one draft so long as the authors feel comfortable
that they can easily minimize the protocol specific text.
Les
From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 7:44 AM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Po
Authors,
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-hegdeppsenak-isis-sr-algo and
draft-ppsenak-ospf-sr-flex-algo?
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs
3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
If you are listed as a document author or contributor
Speaking as WG member, I support draft adoption. It was being presented at 2
IETFs and it is one of the more exciting developments in LSR (I’m sure there
are other WGs that are feeling insecure based on the power and flexibility of
this enhancement ;^).
Speaking as WG Co-Chair – I think it woul
Support.
Best Regards,
Huaimo
From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 11:24 AM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Poll for Flex Algorithm Drafts
Speaking as WG member, I support draft adoption. It was being
Support .
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 17, 2018, at 07:44, Acee Lindem (acee)
mailto:a...@cisco.com>> wrote:
This begins a two-week adoption poll for the following Flex Algorithm drafts:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hegdeppsenak-isis-sr-flex-algo/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft
+1
(I guess you meant :s/LSR/SR ;-) )
Thanks
--Bruno
From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 5:24 PM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Poll for Flex Algorithm Drafts
Speaking as WG member, I support draf
Support as co-author and also support combining the OSPF and ISIS aspects in a
single draft.
Thanks,
Ketan
From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: 17 April 2018 20:14
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Poll for Flex Algorithm Drafts
This begins a two-week adopti
I support both drafts.
Thanks.
s.
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018, 4:44 PM Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> This begins a two-week adoption poll for the following Flex Algorithm
> drafts:
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hegdeppsenak-isis-sr-flex-algo/
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-
No. However, the one that initially came to mind has had ownership discussions
with SR…
Thanks,
Acee
From: Bruno Decraene
Date: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 11:36 AM
To: Acee Lindem , "lsr@ietf.org"
Subject: RE: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Poll for Flex Algorithm Drafts
+1
(I guess you mean
Hi Acee,
there is pending IPR and the formal IETF IPR Disclosure will be filed soon.
thanks,
Peter
On 17/04/18 17:16 , Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
Authors,
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-hegdeppsenak-isis-sr-algo
and draft-ppsenak-ospf-sr-flex-algo?
If so, has this IPR been d
Speaking as a WG member:
I think a distributed flooding algorithm is more robust and will converge
faster when there more than one concurrent failure in the flooding topology.
Additionally, if there is a node failure of the flooding leader and that node
is a node is on flooding topology, there
Acee,
> I think a distributed flooding algorithm is more robust and will converge
> faster when there more than one concurrent failure in the flooding topology.
No doubt. However, we do not normally attempt to protect against multiple
concurrent failures. Regardless of how the flooding topolo
Hi all,
This draft is a replacement of
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-ospf-flooding-reduction-in-msdc. Any
comments and suggestions are welcome.
Best
regards,Xiaohu--label.colon.from.englishinternet-drafts
label.colon.send.tim
I am not aware of any IPR.
Rgds
Shraddha
From: Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 8:46 PM
To: draft-hegdeppsenak-isis-sr-flex-a...@ietf.org;
draft-ppsenak-ospf-sr-flex-a...@ietf.org
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: IPR for IS-IS and OSPF Flex Algorithm Drafts
Authors,
Are you aware of
Hi Acee,
I am not aware of any IPR other than the one that Peter has referenced below.
Thanks,
Ketan
-Original Message-
From: Peter Psenak (ppsenak)
Sent: 18 April 2018 00:30
To: Acee Lindem (acee) ;
draft-hegdeppsenak-isis-sr-flex-a...@ietf.org;
draft-ppsenak-ospf-sr-flex-a...@ietf.o
19 matches
Mail list logo
