Robert,
match DSCP X
set context Y or plane Z doesn’t make it any different.
It has been used and abused in any possible way. If you want to write a BCP
saying - use it for X/Y/Z but not for A/B/C because of - your business.
As to using it someplace else - I’d expect respective documents to
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 12:14:45AM -0800, Jeff Tantsura wrote:
> P.S. in my previous life, working on 5G transport slicing (yes, i know :))
> - i needed per slice identity over the common transport, we ended up
> looking at UDP port ranges, rather than DSCP - too few bits
Right. The main issue is
Rob,
Thats actually a good example, i had forgotten about that one.
This is also a lot more scalable than MTR given how (if i
remember correctly, you would only have O(#DSCP,#egres-PE)
entries.
Cheers
Toerless
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 04:47:26PM -0800, Rob Shakir wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
Title : OSPFv3 Extensions for Segment Routing
Authors : Peter Psenak
Stefano Previdi
Hi Qin,
This was at a time when there were concerns about advertising non-IGP specific
information in OSPF(v3) Router Information LSAs. We've since assuaged our
concerns with RFC 7770 where I added the functionality of advertising multiple
instances of the OSPF(v3) Router Information LSA.
Reviewer: Pete Resnick
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Hi Qin,
This looks more like applying a mechanism analogous to BGP capabilities
negotiation to PCC<->PCE. However, please check and file the necessary IPR
disclosure if applicable.
Thanks,
Acee
From: Qin Wu
Date: Friday, November 16, 2018 at 2:44 AM
To: Acee Lindem ,
Hi Pete,
please see inline:
On 16/11/18 14:45 , Pete Resnick wrote:
Reviewer: Pete Resnick
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-16: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
Peter:
Hi!
-18 still has one reference to the IA-flag in §8.1. Please remove it.
Thanks!
Alvaro.
On November 16, 2018 at 1:20:18 AM, Mahendra Singh Negi (
mahendrasi...@huawei.com) wrote:
Hi Acee/Peter,
This change doesn't impact our implementation.
Thanks,
Mahendra
-Original
[Took the ops-dir and the ietf@ietf lists off.]
Hi!
Joe makes a really good point below about the TLV types and RFC7770. It
looks like we all missed it! :-(
To quote Peter (from a message in this thread), "I don't think it is good
to specify the behavior which is described somewhere else.”
A quick comment below –
Cheers & have a great weekend!
--
Uma C.
From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Tantsura
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 12:15 AM
To: Robert Raszuk
Cc: t...@cs.fau.de; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; r...@rob.sh;
tony1ath...@gmail.com; lsr@ietf.org
12 matches
Mail list logo
