Re: [Lsr] Flooding Path Direction

HI les I also find it undesirable to enforce unidirectionality. Receiving an LSP on an unexpected interface should be treated as an artifact of a loss of synchronization IMO. Thanks Dave -Original Message- From: Lsr On Behalf Of Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2019

Re: [Lsr] Flooding Path Direction

On 4/5/19, 9:29 AM, "Lsr on behalf of David Allan I" wrote: HI les I also find it undesirable to enforce unidirectionality. Receiving an LSP on an unexpected interface should be treated as an artifact of a loss of synchronization IMO. Right - these transients are just

[Lsr] IETF 104 LSR Meeting Minutes

Hi All, I’ve posted the meeting minutes from the IETF LSR meetings in Prague: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-104-lsr/ Please let me know if you have any question or there is anything that needs to be corrected. Thanks, Yingzhen ___ rtgwg

Re: [Lsr] When to augment LSR base YANG modules...

On 2019-04-02 12:08, tom petch wrote: - Original Message - From: "Mikael Abrahamsson" Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2019 8:07 AM On Sat, 30 Mar 2019, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: Additionally, I agree with Yingzhen's comment that it is not clear that we want a separate YANG module for