Hi Tony:
So for my edification/education, this is a general behavior that in the absence
of any specific algorithm is postulated. (?)
The piece I do not quite get is "adding until fixed". Is the working
assumption that things have broken down to the point that there is no
synchronization of
Hi Dave,
> So for my edification/education, this is a general behavior that in the
> absence of any specific algorithm is postulated. (?)
Yes.
> The piece I do not quite get is "adding until fixed". Is the working
> assumption that things have broken down to the point that there is no
>
Hi!
I just entered a DISCUSS position related
to draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls (see below). I believe that the
issue needs to be solved in conjunction with the IGP extension drafts, so
I’m copying the authors/shepherds/chairs here.
Thanks!
Alvaro.
On April 10, 2019 at 4:25:22 PM, Alva
LSR Working Group,
This begins a two week WG last call for the subject document. Please enter
your support or objection to the document before 12:00 AM (EDT) on Wednesday,
April 25th, 2019.
Thanks,
Acee
___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://ww
LSR Working Group,
This begins a two week WG last call for the subject document. Please enter
your support or objection to the document before 12:00 AM (EDT) on Wednesday,
April 25th, 2019.
Thanks,
Acee
___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://ww
Authors,
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-isis-te-app-06.txt?
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond
to this email regardle
Authors, Contributors,
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-isis-te-app-06.txt?
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond
to this
Alvaro,
Thanks for your review. I’m not sure whether I should reply here or on the
iesg’s list.
It looks to me that you don’t disagree with what is written in the draft but
rather with the fact that the draft may suggest that IGPs should do things
which are in fact not specified in the IGPs dra
On April 10, 2019 at 5:46:56 PM, Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia -
FR/Paris-Saclay) (martin.vigour...@nokia.com) wrote:
Martin:
Hi!
It looks to me that you don’t disagree with what is written in the draft
but rather with the fact that the draft may suggest that IGPs should do
things which are in fact n
Yes/support
Regards,
Jeff
> On Apr 10, 2019, at 23:24, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>
> LSR Working Group,
>
> This begins a two week WG last call for the subject document. Please enter
> your support or objection to the document before 12:00 AM (EDT) on Wednesday,
> April 25th, 2019.
>
>
I am not aware of any relevant IPR.
Les
From: Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 2:36 PM
To: draft-ietf-isis-te-...@ietf.org; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
; Acee Lindem (acee) ; Hannes Gredler
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: IPR Poll for "IS-IS TE Attributes per application" -
dra
Hi Huaimo,
Thank you for the example, this helps a lot. It’s clearer and I think it will
help illuminate many things. Of course, it also generates more questions.
In your algorithm you’re computing the full backup path to provide connectivity
between the previously connected nodes (e.g., R0
Hello,
I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
Thanks,
Ketan
From: Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: 11 April 2019 03:06
To: draft-ietf-isis-te-...@ietf.org; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
; Acee Lindem (acee) ; Hannes Gredler
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: IPR Poll for "IS-IS TE Attributes per ap
13 matches
Mail list logo
