Hi Warren,
On 15/05/2020 03:25, Warren Kumari via Datatracker wrote:
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines.
Hi,
I'm going to update the draft to use bit 0x40 in "OSPFv3 Prefix Options
(8 bits) registry" for E-Flag (ELC Flag).
thanks,
Peter
On 07/05/2020 15:10, Alvaro Retana wrote:
Dear lsr WG:
If you’ve been following the progress of this document, you will have
noticed that it is already in
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 7:28 AM Peter Psenak wrote:
> Hi Warren,
>
> On 15/05/2020 03:25, Warren Kumari via Datatracker wrote:
> > Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: No Objection
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line
Hi Warren,
From: Warren Kumari
Date: Friday, May 15, 2020 at 1:25 PM
To: "Peter Psenak (ppsenak)"
Cc: The IESG , "draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-...@ietf.org"
, "lsr-cha...@ietf.org"
, "lsr@ietf.org" , Acee Lindem
, Alvaro Retana
Subject: Re: Warren Kumari's No Objection on
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 1:34 PM Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> Hi Warren,
>
>
>
> *From: *Warren Kumari
> *Date: *Friday, May 15, 2020 at 1:25 PM
> *To: *"Peter Psenak (ppsenak)"
> *Cc: *The IESG , "draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-...@ietf.org" <
> draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-...@ietf.org>, "lsr-cha...@ietf.org" <
This begins a 3 week (due to holidays) WG adoption call for the “Flooding
Topology Computation Algorithm” draft. Please issue your support or objection
to this list by 11:59 PM, UTC on June 5th, 2020. Here is a URL for your
convenience.
Authors,
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-08.txt.
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond
to this
Warren –
The problem I have with your suggestion is that we do not know whether the
destination protocol for redistribution even supports the signaling.
I am very supportive of Acee’s characterization of redistribution as outside
the scope of specification.
I think we can say what happens
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 8:07 PM Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
wrote:
> Warren –
>
>
>
> The problem I have with your suggestion is that we do not know whether the
> destination protocol for redistribution even supports the signaling.
>
>
>
> I am very supportive of Acee’s characterization of
Support.
Best Regards,
Huaimo as co-author
From: Lsr on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 3:39 PM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] Flooding Topology Computation Algorithm -
draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-08 Working Group Adoption Call
Hi Acee,
Yes. I am aware of IPRs that apply to this draft, which have been disclosed
in compliance with IETF IPR rules.
Best Regards,
Huaimo
From: Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 3:47 PM
To: draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduct...@ietf.org
Cc:
Hi Alvaro,
please see inline (##PP)
On 14/05/2020 19:26, Alvaro Retana wrote:
On May 5, 2020 at 6:08:27 AM, Peter Psenak wrote:
Peter:
Hi!
...
I tried to address all of them, some have been resolved during ISIS
draft review, in which case I took the same resolution for this draf.
Please
12 matches
Mail list logo
