Hi Gyan,
Gyan> IPFIX has been traditionally been used for flow analysis and to that end
all that was required is support of the data plane encapsulation. With your
proposed SR support idea you are really transforming the IPFIX to be used for
not just flow monitoring at that level solely, but n
Hi Thomas
Sorry for any misunderstanding. I am well aware of the origins and history
behind IPFIX and Neflow and use with BGP monitoring.
I was not aware of IE 46 and how that was being leveraged to support SR IGP
extensions sid types.
After reviewing your IPFIX slides related to IE 46 registr
Hi Thomas,
I think questions from both Ketan and Gyan on the IE usage are very important.
The value should be described clearly in the draft. So that people now how to
implement and use them.
Here your replay to Ketan on the mplsTopLabelType is clear to me. You want to
account the traffic with
Hi Thomas
Just a thought to build on what Tianran mentioned.
It almost seems as if IPFIX taking on the role of BGP-LU / PCE centralized
controller function to to create a SR graph of the topology. We already
have all the SR topology data in the PCE for path instantiation and
steering.
Do we al
Hi Thomas,
Please check inline below.
From: thomas.g...@swisscom.com
Sent: 15 August 2020 11:31
To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; han...@gredler.at
Cc: lsr@ietf.org; spr...@ietf.org; ops...@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Lsr] draft-tgraf-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type
Hi Ketan,
* This helps identificatio
