[Lsr] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-flood-reflection-10

2022-10-03 Thread Rich Salz via Datatracker
Reviewer: Rich Salz Review result: Has Nits I am a routing naïf and do not have a lot of time these days. I hope this review is still useful, anyway. The glossary was very helpful. I still don't have a clear understanding of L1 and L2. The picture is a tour de force. The description "Figure 1

[Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-08: (with COMMENT)

2022-10-03 Thread Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-01.txt

2022-10-03 Thread Christian Hopps
[As wg-member] --- inline... "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" writes: Chris - -Original Message- From: Christian Hopps Sent: Monday, October 3, 2022 8:37 AM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Cc: Robert Raszuk ; Tony Li ; Henk Smit ; lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification

[Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-24: (with COMMENT)

2022-10-03 Thread Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-24: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-01.txt

2022-10-03 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Chris - > -Original Message- > From: Christian Hopps > Sent: Monday, October 3, 2022 8:37 AM > To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > Cc: Robert Raszuk ; Tony Li ; Henk Smit > ; lsr@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv- > 01.txt > >

[Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-ttz-06.txt

2022-10-03 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF. Title : IS-IS Topology-Transparent Zone Authors : Huaimo Chen Richard Li

Re: [Lsr] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2022-10-03 Thread Lars Eggert
Hi, On 2022-9-30, at 16:37, Ketan Talaulikar wrote: > In brief, the proposal was to introduce the following text in the IANA > considerations: > > >This document updates the guidance to IANA for further allocations >from the "OSPFv2 Extended Link TLV Sub-TLVs" [1] and the >"OSPFv3

[Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-24.txt

2022-10-03 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF. Title : IGP Flexible Algorithm Authors : Peter Psenak Shraddha Hegde

Re: [Lsr] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-23: (with COMMENT)

2022-10-03 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Lars, thanks for your comments, I incorporated then in the version 24 that has just been published. thanks, Peter On 30/09/2022 14:05, Lars Eggert via Datatracker wrote: Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-23: No Objection When responding,

Re: [Lsr] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-23

2022-10-03 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Linda, the version 24 includes the new section about the number of flex-algos as you requested. thanks, Peter On 22/09/2022 16:53, Linda Dunbar wrote: Peter, Thank you! I've studied this draft in LSR WG multiple times. I had a difficult time thinking how a router computing the paths

Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-01.txt

2022-10-03 Thread Christian Hopps
[As wg-member] I think the draft should include a table of all top level TLVS as rows and for columns we have - "Implicit Single TLV Only" (e.g., no key info) - "Implicit Multi-TLV Only" - "Explicit Single TLV Only" - "Explicit Multi-TLV-Allowed" This draft then would *explicitly* cover the