Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Last Call for "Signaling MSD (Maximum SID Depth) using OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd-10.txt

2018-05-10 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi Jeff, The version 12 addresses all my comments and thanks for the updates. Thanks, Ketan From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.i...@gmail.com> Sent: 08 May 2018 04:53 To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <ket...@cisco.com>; Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com>; lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re:

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call on "Signaling MSD (Maximum SID Depth) using OSPF"

2018-05-11 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi All, I support the further progression of this document. We have implementations of the same as well. Thanks, Ketan From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: 10 May 2018 20:50 To: lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call on "Signaling MSD (Maximum

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00

2018-05-23 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Support publication for this update as it fixes an erroneous encoding description in RFC7810. Thanks, Ketan -Original Message- From: Lsr On Behalf Of Christian Hopps Sent: 23 May 2018 20:59 To: lsr@ietf.org Cc: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org;

Re: [Lsr] OSPF LLS Extensions for Local Interface ID Advertisement - draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-02

2018-06-18 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hello Acee/All, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Thanks, Ketan From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: 18 June 2018 20:55 To: lsr@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface...@ietf.orig Subject: [Lsr] OSPF LLS Extensions for Local Interface ID Advertisement -

Re: [Lsr] Signalling ERLD (ISIS, OSPF and BGP-LS)

2018-06-13 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) Sent: 13 June 2018 13:55 To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; i...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; spr...@ietf.org Subject: RE: Signalling ERLD (ISIS, OSPF and BGP-LS) Indeed, the debate that made BGP-LS to go down the ERLD path is of pragmatic motivation. The major

Re: [Lsr] IGP TE Metric Extensions

2018-06-05 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi Muthu, These are implementation specific aspects and I am not sure if this is something that the draft should be getting into. Thanks, Ketan From: Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal Sent: 05 June 2018 17:19 To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) Cc: Stefano Previdi (IETF) ; lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura

Re: [Lsr] IGP TE Metric Extensions

2018-06-05 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
2018 17:52 To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) Cc: Stefano Previdi (IETF) ; lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura Subject: Re: [Lsr] IGP TE Metric Extensions If these are only implementation specific aspects and shouldn't get into the draft, what is the point of sections 5,6,7? Why would it hurt to say what

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for OSPF LLS Extensions for Local Interface ID Advertisement - draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-02

2018-06-18 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Support as a co-author From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: 18 June 2018 21:37 To: lsr@ietf.org Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for OSPF LLS Extensions for Local Interface ID Advertisement - draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-02 This begins an LSR WG last call for the subject

Re: [Lsr] Concerns with draft-chunduri-lsr-isis-preferred-path-routing

2018-07-17 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi Uma, Please check inline below. Thanks, Ketan -Original Message- From: Uma Chunduri Sent: 17 July 2018 08:57 To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; lsr@ietf.org Cc: spr...@ietf.org Subject: RE: Concerns with draft-chunduri-lsr-isis-preferred-path-routing Hi Ketan, In-line [Uma]: -- Uma

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00

2018-07-17 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi All, I was reviewing this draft as the Shepherd. It is a fairly simple and straightforward bis update to RFC7810 to fix an encoding error. There is one point that I would like the authors and WG to consider. The draft in the appendix talks about two interpretations of the erroneous

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00

2018-07-17 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
. Let me know if this suffices and we can publish an update. Les > -Original Message- > From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 6:55 AM > To: Acee Lindem (acee) ; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > ; Christian Hopps ; > lsr@ietf.org > Cc: lsr

Re: [Lsr] 答复: 答复: 答复: Regarding OSPF extension for inter-area topology retrieval

2018-07-24 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- From: Peter Psenak (ppsenak) Sent: 24 July 2018 04:22 To: Aijun Wang ; 'Rob Shakir' Cc: 'Dongjie (Jimmy)' ; cho...@chopps.org; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; lsr@ietf.org; Acee Lindem (acee) Subject: Re: 答复: [Lsr] 答复: 答复: Regarding OSPF extension for inter-area topology retrieval Hi Aijun

[Lsr] Concerns with draft-chunduri-lsr-isis-preferred-path-routing

2018-07-17 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi Uma, I would like share more context on the concerns that I raised on this proposal in LSR WG yesterday where we could not complete our discussion on the mike due to time constraints. IGPs were originally invented for topology computation and then route programming based on the SPT

Re: [Lsr] [mpls] Comments on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label

2018-07-05 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi Xiaohu, The IGP drafts define MSD as a framework that enable advertisements for various type of SID limits – starting with the Base MSD Type – 1. You are referring to this generic construct of MSD in the text you quote below. It is, however, the Base MSD (type 1) which is aligned with the

Re: [Lsr] Implementations of draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload

2018-04-07 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi Alvaro/All, I am not aware of an implementation of this draft that uses the proposed BGP-LS TLV. So there is no issue with using the suggested value of 1121 (or any other available). Thanks, Ketan From: Lsr On Behalf Of Alvaro Retana Sent: 07 April 2018 00:19 To:

Re: [Lsr] Inconsistence regarding the definition of "Adj-SID Sub-TLV" between OSPF and ISIS extension for Segment Routing

2018-04-10 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
. Thanks, Ketan From: Aijun Wang <wangai...@tsinghua.org.cn> Sent: 10 April 2018 13:46 To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <ket...@cisco.com> Cc: 'Jeffrey Haas' <jh...@pfrc.org>; lsr@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org Subject: 答复: [Lsr] Inconsistence regarding the definition of "Adj-SID Sub-TLV&

Re: [Lsr] Flex Algorithms Drafts

2018-04-12 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi Acee, I don't see a problem with the merge for ISIS and OSPF specs in a single document in this case. Authors are mostly identical and even though the ISIS spec was published earlier, the OSPF spec is fully in sync and leverages all those comments. A lot of the text applies to both

Re: [Lsr] Inconsistence regarding the definition of "Adj-SID Sub-TLV" between OSPF and ISIS extension for Segment Routing

2018-04-09 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
have identified in your deployment on the producer side. Thanks, Ketan From: Aijun Wang <wangai...@tsinghua.org.cn> Sent: 08 April 2018 07:02 To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <ket...@cisco.com> Cc: 'Jeffrey Haas' <jh...@pfrc.org>; lsr@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org Subject: 答复: [

Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Poll for Flex Algorithm Drafts

2018-04-17 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Support as co-author and also support combining the OSPF and ISIS aspects in a single draft. Thanks, Ketan From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: 17 April 2018 20:14 To: lsr@ietf.org Subject: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Poll for Flex Algorithm Drafts This

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16

2018-04-23 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi Chris, I had shared some comments and requests for clarifications on the OSPF MSD draft. Some of them are also applicable to the ISIS version. Please find the same attached. Thanks, Ketan -Original Message- From: Lsr On Behalf Of Christian Hopps Sent: 23

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16

2018-04-23 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Please ignore my email below, it is not applicable to the ISIS SR draft in subject. I support draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions progressing further. Thanks, Ketan -Original Message- From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) Sent: 24 April 2018 08:04 To: 'Christian Hopps' <

Re: [Lsr] Inconsistence regarding the definition of "Adj-SID Sub-TLV" between OSPF and ISIS extension for Segment Routing

2018-04-02 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi Aijun, Can you clarify what you mean by "inconsistencies"? Also, you are referring the old version of OSPFv3 SR draft before it was aligned with the OSPFv2 SR draft. Please check https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-11#section-6.1 OSPF and ISIS are

Re: [Lsr] Inconsistence regarding the definition of "Adj-SID Sub-TLV" between OSPF and ISIS extension for Segment Routing

2018-04-04 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
lt;wangai...@tsinghua.org.cn> Sent: 04 April 2018 07:50 To: 'stefano previdi' <stef...@previdi.net>; Peter Psenak (ppsenak) <ppse...@cisco.com> Cc: lsr@ietf.org; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <ket...@cisco.com>; Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com> Subject: 答复: [Lsr] Inconsiste

Re: [Lsr] OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family Traffic Engineering Tunnels - draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-04.txt

2018-10-24 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hello All, I support this simple but important extension. A couple of minor comments on the draft: 1) Sec 3 says A node that implements X-AF routing SHOULD advertise, in the corresponding Node Local Address sub-TLV, all X-AF IPv4 and IPv6 addresses local to the router that can

Re: [Lsr] OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family Traffic Engineering Tunnels - draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-04.txt

2018-10-28 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
To: Alexander Okonnikov Cc: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; Acee Lindem (acee) ; lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family Traffic Engineering Tunnels - draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-04.txt Hi Alexander, > I tend to agree with Ketan, but with slightly different propo

Re: [Lsr] "OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family Traffic Engineering Tunnels" - draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-05

2019-02-22 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Talaulikar (ketant) Subject: Re: [Lsr] "OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family Traffic Engineering Tunnels" - draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-05 Hi Acee, For me current version doesn't change the solution. My comments are follow: 1. Introduction "TE Extensions to OSPFv2 [RFC3630] and

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR poll.

2019-02-22 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
I support the adoption of this draft by the WG. Thanks, Ketan -Original Message- From: Lsr On Behalf Of Christian Hopps Sent: 11 February 2019 16:15 To: lsr@ietf.org Cc: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; cho...@chopps.org Subject: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for

Re: [Lsr] draft-ketant-idr-bgp-ls-bgp-only-fabric

2019-03-11 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi Robert, Please check inline below. From: Robert Raszuk Sent: 10 March 2019 21:40 To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) Cc: idr@ietf. org ; lsr@ietf.org Subject: draft-ketant-idr-bgp-ls-bgp-only-fabric Hi Ketan, I have read your proposal of defining topology flooding in BGP with interest

[Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-00.txt

2019-03-06 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
(ppsenak) ; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-00.txt A new version of I-D, draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Ketan Talaulikar and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft

Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll on "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

2019-02-13 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi Acee, I am not aware of any IPR other than the one disclosed below. Thanks, Ketan From: Aijun Wang Sent: 13 February 2019 07:19 To: Acee Lindem (acee) ; draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-...@ietf.org Cc: lsr@ietf.org Subject: 答复: [Lsr] IPR Poll on "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator"

Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IS-IS TE Attributes per application" - draft-ietf-isis-te-app-06.txt (adding contributors)

2019-04-10 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hello, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Thanks, Ketan From: Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: 11 April 2019 03:06 To: draft-ietf-isis-te-...@ietf.org; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; Acee Lindem (acee) ; Hannes Gredler Cc: lsr@ietf.org Subject: IPR Poll for "IS-IS TE Attribute

Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "OSPF Link Traffic Engineering (TE) Attribute Reuse" - draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-07.txt

2019-04-11 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hello, I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Thanks, Ketan From: Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: 11 April 2019 21:40 To: draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-re...@ietf.org Cc: lsr@ietf.org; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; Hannes Gredler ; Acee Lindem (acee) Subject: IPR Poll for "OSPF Link Tr

Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IS-IS Extensions to Support Routing over IPv6 Dataplane" - draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-05.txt

2019-05-15 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi Acee, As a contributor, I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR for this draft. Thanks, Ketan From: Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: 09 May 2019 20:12 To: Stefano Previdi ; Paul Wells (pauwells) ; daniel.vo...@bell.ca; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; satoru.matsush...@g.softbank.co.jp; bart.peir

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Call for "IS-IS Extensions to Support Routing over IPv6 Dataplane" - draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-05.txt

2019-05-09 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Support the adoption of this draft. Thanks, Ketan From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: 09 May 2019 19:20 To: lsr@ietf.org Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Call for "IS-IS Extensions to Support Routing over IPv6 Dataplane" - draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-05.txt We been

Re: [Lsr] Adjacency SID and Passive Interface

2019-05-10 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
+1 Hi Oliver, Technically Adj-SID refers to an IGP adjacency between two nodes as per RFC8402 semantics. I don't think a passive (stub) link falls under that category. It would be better to define a passive link separately (somewhat on lines of what was done for inter-AS TE) so that it does

[Lsr] Update for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-02.txt

2019-07-08 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
/comments/feedback/contributions from the WG. Thanks, Ketan & Peter -Original Message- From: internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: 08 July 2019 17:36 To: Peter Psenak (ppsenak) ; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-02.txt A

Re: [Lsr] Regd covering BGP-LS extensions for IGP ELC drafts

2019-07-26 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi Sue, No other question. Thanks, Ketan From: Susan Hares Sent: 26 July 2019 15:19 To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; Acee Lindem (acee) ; lsr@ietf.org Cc: i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-...@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Lsr] Regd covering BGP-LS extensions for IGP ELC drafts

Re: [Lsr] [Idr] draft-merciaz-idr-bgp-bfd-strict-mode

2019-07-25 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi Albert, Thanks for your feedback from an operator perspective – it is valuable. This “BFD hold up” behaviour that you desire is best handled by BFD since I would expect that similar behaviour would be desired across routing protocols (OSPF, ISIS, BGP) and perhaps other clients. IMHO this

[Lsr] Regd covering BGP-LS extensions for IGP ELC drafts

2019-07-25 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi Acee/All, During the LSR WG meeting on Monday, we talked about covering the BGP-LS aspects of the following two IGP drafts in those drafts instead of requiring a separate document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc/

Re: [Lsr] Regd covering BGP-LS extensions for IGP ELC drafts

2019-07-26 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc/ Thanks, Ketan From: Susan Hares Sent: 25 July 2019 22:58 To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; Acee Lindem (acee) ; lsr@ietf.org Cc: i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-...@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Lsr] Regd covering BGP-LS extensions

[Lsr] Update to OSPFv3 SRv6 extensions draft for review/feedback

2019-07-08 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
-authors) -Original Message- From: internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: 08 July 2019 18:12 To: Peter Psenak (ppsenak) ; Zhenbin Li ; Dean Cheng ; Zhibo Hu ; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) Subject: New Version Notification for draft-li-ospf-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-04.txt A new version of I-D, draft

Re: [Lsr] "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" - draft-li-ospf-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-07 Questions/Comments

2019-11-17 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi Acee, Thanks for your review and comments. Please check inline below. From: Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: 18 November 2019 06:18 To: draft-li-ospf-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org Cc: lsr@ietf.org Subject: "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" - draft-li-ospf-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-07 Questions/Comments

Re: [Lsr] "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" - draft-li-ospf-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-07 Questions/Comments

2019-11-17 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi Acee, Please check inline below. From: Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: 18 November 2019 08:42 To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; draft-li-ospf-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org Cc: lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" - draft-li-ospf-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-07 Questions/Co

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric

2019-12-13 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
I support this document adoption as a co-author and I am not aware of any IPR associated with it. Thanks, Ketan -Original Message- From: Christian Hopps Sent: 13 December 2019 16:58 To: lsr@ietf.org Cc: Christian Hopps ; draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-reverse-met...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

2019-12-13 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
I support the adoption of the document as a co-author and I am not aware of any IPR associated with it. Thanks, Ketan -Original Message- From: Christian Hopps Sent: 13 December 2019 17:25 To: lsr@ietf.org Cc: Christian Hopps ; lsr-...@ietf.org;

Re: [Lsr] "YANG Module for IS-IS Reverse Metric" - draft-hopps-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-02

2019-12-05 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
+1 – I also support the adoption of this document by the WG. Thanks, Ketan From: Lsr On Behalf Of Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Sent: 05 December 2019 11:13 To: Acee Lindem (acee) ; lsr@ietf.org Cc: Christian Hopps Subject: Re: [Lsr] "YANG Module for IS-IS Reverse Metric" -

Re: [Lsr] clarification of locator block and locator node in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming and draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-03-03 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
March 2020 23:39 To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) Cc: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; lsr@ietf.org; SPRING WG List ; draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming ; Peter Psenak (ppsenak) ; Bruno Decraene Subject: Re: [Lsr] clarification of locator block and locator node in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network

Re: [Lsr] clarification of locator block and locator node in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming and draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-02-27 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi Chris, I agree with Peter and I would suggest to drop LSR since this is not a protocol specific thing. I believe the text in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming clears says what locator block and locator node are. What more details do you think are required? Thanks, Ketan From:

Re: [Lsr] clarification of locator block and locator node in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming and draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-02-28 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
wait for him to clarify. Thanks, Ketan From: Lsr On Behalf Of bruno.decra...@orange.com Sent: 28 February 2020 14:34 To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; Chris Bowers Cc: lsr@ietf.org; SPRING WG List ; draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming ; Peter Psenak (ppsenak) Subject: Re: [Lsr

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-01-23 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Support. As a contributor, I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this draft. Thanks, Ketan -Original Message- From: Lsr On Behalf Of Paul Wells (pauwells) Sent: 24 January 2020 06:10 To: cho...@chopps.org; lsr@ietf.org Cc: lsr-...@ietf.org; Acee Lindem (acee) Subject: Re:

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions

2020-01-29 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hello Zhenqiang Li, Thanks for your review and comments. Please check inline below. From: li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com Sent: 30 January 2020 08:46 To: Christian Hopps ; lsr Cc: draft-li-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions ; lsr-ads ; Christian Hopps ; Acee Lindem (acee) Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions

2020-01-30 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Please check inline again. From: li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com Sent: 30 January 2020 13:46 To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; Christian Hopps ; lsr Cc: draft-li-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions ; lsr-ads ; Christian Hopps ; Acee Lindem (acee) Subject: Re: RE: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions

2020-01-31 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Thanks Acee. Your proposed text looks much better. Thanks, Ketan -Original Message- From: Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: 31 January 2020 18:02 To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; Peter Psenak (ppsenak) ; li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com; Christian Hopps ; lsr Cc: draft-li-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions

2020-01-31 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- From: Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: 30 January 2020 23:02 To: Peter Psenak (ppsenak) ; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com; Christian Hopps ; lsr Cc: draft-li-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions ; lsr-ads Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions Hi Peter

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions

2020-01-24 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi All, Support the draft as a co-author and I am not aware of any IPR other than what has been disclosed on this draft. Thanks, Ketan -Original Message- From: Christian Hopps Sent: 24 January 2020 01:55 To: lsr@ietf.org Cc: Christian Hopps ; Acee Lindem (acee) ; lsr-...@ietf.org;

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions

2020-01-30 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
this requirement MUST be ignored. Thanks, Ketan From: Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: 30 January 2020 21:01 To: li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; Christian Hopps ; lsr Cc: draft-li-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions ; lsr-ads Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-ospfv3

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions

2020-02-12 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi Chris/Acee, The WG version of the draft has just been posted. It also includes the changes for the comments received during the adoption as discussed on the mailing list. Thanks, Ketan (on behalf of co-authors) -Original Message- From: Christian Hopps Sent: 12 February 2020 16:42

Re: [Lsr] Comments on draft-li-ospf-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-07.txt

2020-01-15 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi Acee, Thanks for your review, comments and suggestions. We’ve incorporated them and posted an update for this draft. Note that as requested in a separate email thread, the draft has been renamed so it is associated with the LSR WG instead of the old OSPF one :

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv

2020-01-06 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Support the publication -Original Message- From: Lsr On Behalf Of Christian Hopps Sent: 03 January 2020 00:37 To: lsr@ietf.org Cc: lsr-...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps ; Antoni Przygienda Subject: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv This begins a 2 week WG Last Call,

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

2020-01-07 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Thanks Chris. We've just posted the WG version of this draft that was adopted. -Original Message- From: Lsr On Behalf Of Christian Hopps Sent: 06 January 2020 23:49 To: lsr@ietf.org Cc: lsr-...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps ; draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-m...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr]

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric

2020-01-07 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Thanks Chris. We've just posted the WG version of this draft that was adopted. -Original Message- From: Lsr On Behalf Of Christian Hopps Sent: 06 January 2020 23:51 To: lsr@ietf.org Cc: draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-reverse-met...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps Subject: Re: [Lsr]

Re: [Lsr] clarification of locator block and locator node in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming and draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-03-12 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi Chris, Dropping the draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming authors since we are now back to discussing the ISIS extensions. Please check inline below. From: Chris Bowers Sent: 05 March 2020 21:53 To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) Cc: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; lsr@ietf.org; SPRING WG

Re: [Lsr] [spring] clarification of locator block and locator node in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming and draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-03-12 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
; lsr@ietf.org; Peter Psenak (ppsenak) ; Bruno Decraene Subject: Re: [Lsr] [spring] clarification of locator block and locator node in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming and draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) writes: > [KT] The behaviors currently lis

Re: [Lsr] clarification of locator block and locator node in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming and draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

2020-03-12 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
to preclude a use-case for it in IGPs themselves in the future. Thanks, Ketan From: Chris Bowers Sent: 12 March 2020 20:29 To: Peter Psenak (ppsenak) ; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) Cc: lsr@ietf.org; SPRING WG List ; Bruno Decraene Subject: Re: [Lsr] clarification of locator block and locator node

Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo

2020-05-09 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi Wang, You are correct. Though I wouldn't call it a goal but rather a benefit/advantage - same applies to SR-MPLS where the label stack can be reduced. Thanks, Ketan From: Lsr On Behalf Of Wang, Weibin (NSB - CN/Shanghai) Sent: 08 May 2020 19:07 To: lsr@ietf.org Subject: [Lsr]

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01.txt

2020-06-30 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi All, This is mostly a refresh with editorial updates. We look forward to review and feedback. Thanks, Ketan (on behalf of co-authors) -Original Message- From: Lsr On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: 30 June 2020 14:20 To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org Cc: lsr@ietf.org Subject:

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06.txt

2020-06-30 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi All, We've recently submitted an update to this draft with the following changes: 1) Introduced a new Prefix Originator Sub-TLV for carrying the reachable address of the node originating the prefix advertisement. This is equivalent to the similar ISIS extension -

[Lsr] IANA early allocation request for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

2020-06-30 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hello Acee/Chris, The authors would like to request IANA early allocations for this draft. Thanks, Ketan (on behalf of co-authors) -Original Message- From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) Sent: 30 June 2020 14:25 To: lsr@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict

[Lsr] WG adoption request for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-l2bundles

2020-06-30 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
as RFC8668 provided for IS-IS. Thanks, Ketan -Original Message- From: internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: 30 June 2020 20:01 To: Peter Psenak (ppsenak) ; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-02.txt A new version of I-D, draft-ketant

Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

2020-07-05 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
: Peter Psenak (ppsenak) ; mraj...@juniper.net; lsr@ietf.org; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com; aretana.i...@gmail.com; alvaro.ret...@futurewei.com; acee=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org Subject: [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict

Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

2020-07-02 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
+1 -Original Message- From: Peter Psenak Sent: 02 July 2020 13:11 To: Acee Lindem (acee) ; iana-prot-pa...@iana.org Cc: lsr@ietf.org; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com; alvaro.ret...@futurewei.com Subject: Re: [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request

Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

2020-07-08 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Thanks Amanda. -Original Message- From: Lsr On Behalf Of Amanda Baber via RT Sent: 09 July 2020 01:37 To: Acee Lindem (acee) Cc: alvaro.ret...@futurewei.com; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com; mraj...@juniper.net; acee=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org